On Sat, May 2, 2020 at 4:33 AM Christopher <ctubbsii@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Those are bugs filed against RPM. Is the RPM package responsible for > executing lsetfilecon, or is it the grub2 package? If the grub2 > package, it seems to me that they should know that EFI partitions will > never support lsetfilecon and they should never try. If it's RPM, then > it looks like it is suppressed upstream and the fix will be > incorporated eventually. I guess I don't know which component is > actually responsible for causing the execution of lsetfilecon. You're right, but there is discussion of the grub2 issue in bug 1722766. A number of bugs have been filed against grub2 specifically: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1819817 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827922 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829137 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830399 So far, though, no word from the maintainer on those bugs. -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
