Re: Fedora 31->32 dnf system-update experience

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 09:24:14AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Not that it's a huge deal for me but I wouldn't call the upgrade smooth.
> 
> There were a bunch of python2 packages that needed to be removed which
> necessitated --allowerasing which I've never had to do before.

This should not be the case. If you have any such packages, please always
report it as a bug against fedora-obsolete-packages. This should be done
even after GA, since we can always fix the upgrade path for people who didn't
upgrade immediately.

> Now this, which I'm guessing is a packaging issue which a user shouldn't
> have to deal with:
> 
> Error: Transaction test error:
>   file /usr/lib/firmware/intel/sof-tplg from install of
> alsa-sof-firmware-1.4.2-5.fc32.noarch conflicts with file from package
> alsa-firmware-1.2.1-4.fc31.noarch

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830753

Zbyszek
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux