I don't know, I am somewhat ambivalent on this. I am not sure who is going to collect the feedback there. Will it be the owner of the change or somebody else? What will be the structure? Will it be just bunch or quotes from random sources? Wouldn't it be better to utilize the "discussion" tab/feature of the wiki instead? Or wouldn't it be better to include the devel ML reference? Vít Dne 05. 05. 20 v 21:28 Ben Cotton napsal(a): > churchyard suggested we add a "Feedback" section to the Change > proposal template[1]. I see two benefits to this: > > 1. It provides FESCo a useful summary of the community feedback (and > in particular the reasoning behind rejecting alternatives) to simplify > the voting process > 2. It improves the historical record so that future Fedorans can > understand why a change was implemented in a particular way and not > another > > I have drafted proposed edits[2] to the Changes documentation that > would add an optional Feedback section to the template. I am opening > this up for community discussion before submitting it to FESCo for > approval. > > The reason we chose to go with making this optional is that making it > mandatory would necessarily add additional wait time before proposals > are sent to FESCo. And also it's better to ease people into the idea. > :-) > > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/EmptyTemplate > [2] https://pagure.io/fedora-pgm/pgm_docs/pull-request/2 > _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
