I'm not the author of the proposal, but my take on this: On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 10:02:19AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > I don't know, I am somewhat ambivalent on this. I am not sure who is > going to collect the feedback there. Will it be the owner of the change > or somebody else? What will be the structure? Will it be just bunch or > quotes from random sources? Yes, the idea is that the author(s) of the change or some people working in coordination with the authors will collect and succinctly summarize feedback and the rejected options. > Wouldn't it be better to utilize the "discussion" tab/feature of the > wiki instead? It's much less visible and the idea is to have items summarized. This is in parallel to the Change itself: we want the Change page to be self-contained, and we don't just refer the reader to the discussion on the mailing list. The Change page is adjusted to incorporate feedback. > Or wouldn't it be better to include the devel ML reference? The ML reference is added automatically by FPM, but our threads are often very long and circuitous. Zbyszek _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
