Re: Fedora 31->32 dnf system-update experience

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 12:05 PM Scott Talbert <swt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 8 May 2020, Michael Catanzaro wrote:

>> That is kind of what I figured.  BTW, I used the GUI method to upgrade.
>
> Yeah me too. And my fedora-obsolete-packages is also gone.
>
> It cannot be installed, either. I wonder: am I misunderstanding how this is
> supposed to work? Or has something improperly obsoleted it?

Sounds like it is new expected behavior of dnf:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827398

The default clean_requirements_on_remove is still something I turn off immediately on any system's dnf.conf. It's come up before[1] that this could be presented way better in the dnf UI, it's very confusing.

[1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/thread/75QEOFNRNPUSFCC533242OFVDEXKEFLS/  

-Dan
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux