Gnu Autoconf
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: bool and C23
- From: "Zack Weinberg" <zack@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: bool and C23
- From: Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: bool and C23
- From: "Zack Weinberg" <zack@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: bool and C23
- From: Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: bool and C23
- From: Bruno Haible <bruno@xxxxxxxxx>
- bool and C23
- From: Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gtk configure fails to detect XInput2.h
- From: Sam James <sam@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: AC_PROG_LEX issue when compiling with -Werror
- From: "Zack Weinberg" <zack@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: AC_PROG_LEX issue when compiling with -Werror
- From: Tobias Brunner <tobias@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: AC_PROG_LEX issue when compiling with -Werror
- From: Tobias Brunner <tobias@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: AC_PROG_LEX issue when compiling with -Werror
- From: "Todd C. Miller" <Todd.Miller@xxxxxxx>
- Re: AC_PROG_LEX issue when compiling with -Werror
- From: "Todd C. Miller" <Todd.Miller@xxxxxxx>
- Re: AC_PROG_LEX issue when compiling with -Werror
- From: Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- AC_PROG_LEX issue when compiling with -Werror
- From: Tobias Brunner <tobias@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to set up autoconf on Ubuntu 20.04
- From: dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: How to set up autoconf on Ubuntu 20.04
- From: Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- How to set up autoconf on Ubuntu 20.04
- From: dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Parallelization of shell scripts for 'configure' etc.
- From: Alex Ameen <alex.ameen.tx@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Parallelization of shell scripts for 'configure' etc.
- From: Simon Josefsson via Discussion list for the autoconf build system <autoconf@xxxxxxx>
- Re: docs linked https://www.gnu.org/savannah-checkouts/gnu/autoconf/ goes to 2.70
- From: Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Parallelization of shell scripts for 'configure' etc.
- From: Alexandre Oliva <oliva@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Parallelization of shell scripts for 'configure' etc.
- From: Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Parallelization of shell scripts for 'configure' etc.
- From: Tim Rühsen <tim.ruehsen@xxxxxx>
- Re: How to prevent warning "The macro `AC_PROG_CC_C99' is obsolete"
- From: "R. Diez" <rdiezmail-temp2@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to prevent warning "The macro `AC_PROG_CC_C99' is obsolete"
- From: Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- How to prevent warning "The macro `AC_PROG_CC_C99' is obsolete"
- From: "R. Diez" <rdiezmail-temp2@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Parallelization of shell scripts for 'configure' etc.
- From: L A Walsh <coreutils@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Parallelization of shell scripts for 'configure' etc.
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Parallelization of shell scripts for 'configure' etc.
- From: Alex Ameen <alex.ameen.tx@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Parallelization of shell scripts for 'configure' etc.
- From: Demi Marie Obenour <demiobenour@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Parallelization of shell scripts for 'configure' etc.
- From: madmurphy <madmurphy333@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Generating configuration files conditionnally?
- From: Sébastien Hinderer <Sebastien.Hinderer@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Generating configuration files conditionnally?
- From: Nick Bowler <nbowler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Generating configuration files conditionnally?
- From: Sébastien Hinderer <Sebastien.Hinderer@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Parallelization of shell scripts for 'configure' etc.
- From: "Zack Weinberg" <zack@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Parallelization of shell scripts for 'configure' etc.
- From: Warren Young <warren@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Parallelization of shell scripts for 'configure' etc.
- From: Bruno Haible <bruno@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Parallelization of shell scripts for 'configure' etc.
- From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Parallelization of shell scripts for 'configure' etc.
- From: Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Parallelization of shell scripts for 'configure' etc.
- From: Ángel <angel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Parallelization of shell scripts for 'configure' etc.
- From: Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Parallelization of shell scripts for 'configure' etc.
- From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Parallelization of shell scripts for 'configure' etc.
- From: Nick Bowler <nbowler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Parallelization of shell scripts for 'configure' etc.
- From: Nick Bowler <nbowler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Parallelization of shell scripts for 'configure' etc.
- From: Steffen Nurpmeso <steffen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Parallelization of shell scripts for 'configure' etc.
- From: Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Parallelization of shell scripts for 'configure' etc.
- From: Michael Orlitzky <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Parallelization of shell scripts for 'configure' etc.
- From: madmurphy <madmurphy333@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Parallelization of shell scripts for 'configure' etc.
- From: Alex Ameen <alex.ameen.tx@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Parallelization of shell scripts for 'configure' etc.
- From: "Dale R. Worley" <worley@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Parallelization of shell scripts for 'configure' etc.
- From: Alex Ameen <alex.ameen.tx@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Parallelization of shell scripts for 'configure' etc.
- From: Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Parallelization of shell scripts for 'configure' etc.
- From: Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: make check to test a few tests, not all
- From: Nick Bowler <nbowler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- make check to test a few tests, not all
- From: Mike Fulton <mikefultonpersonal@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Extensions to M4sh
- From: Alex Ameen <alex.ameen.tx@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Extensions to M4sh
- From: madmurphy <madmurphy333@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Extensions to M4sh
- From: Michael Orlitzky <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Extensions to M4sh
- From: Per Bothner <per@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Extensions to M4sh
- From: Nate Bargmann <n0nb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Extensions to M4sh
- From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Extensions to M4sh
- From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Extensions to M4sh
- From: Michael Orlitzky <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Extensions to M4sh
- From: Demi Marie Obenour <demiobenour@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Extensions to M4sh
- From: "Zack Weinberg" <zack@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Detecting gated functions w/ AC_CHECK_FUNCS()
- From: Philip Prindeville <philipp_subx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Detecting gated functions w/ AC_CHECK_FUNCS()
- From: Nick Bowler <nbowler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Detecting gated functions w/ AC_CHECK_FUNCS()
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Detecting gated functions w/ AC_CHECK_FUNCS()
- From: Philip Prindeville <philipp_subx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Extensions to M4sh
- From: Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Extensions to M4sh
- From: Alex Ameen <alex.ameen.tx@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Accelerate the 'configure' script
- From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx>
- Re: Accelerate the 'configure' script
- From: Demi Marie Obenour <demiobenour@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Accelerate the 'configure' script
- From: Alex Ameen <alex.ameen.tx@xxxxxxxxx>
- Accelerate the 'configure' script
- From: "R. Diez" <rdiezmail-temp2@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Wrong order of preprocessor and compiler flags
- From: Evgeny Grin <k2k@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Wrong order of preprocessor and compiler flags
- From: Peter Johansson <trojkan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: libtool-2.4.7 released [stable]
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Wrong order of preprocessor and compiler flags
- From: Evgeny Grin <k2k@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Wrong order of preprocessor and compiler flags
- From: Alex Ameen <alex.ameen.tx@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Wrong order of preprocessor and compiler flags
- From: Evgeny Grin <k2k@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Wrong order of preprocessor and compiler flags
- From: Evgeny Grin <k2k@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Wrong order of preprocessor and compiler flags
- From: Evgeny Grin <k2k@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Wrong order of preprocessor and compiler flags
- From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Wrong order of preprocessor and compiler flags
- From: "David A. Wheeler" <dr.david.a.wheeler@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Wrong order of preprocessor and compiler flags
- From: Sam James <sam@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Wrong order of preprocessor and compiler flags
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Wrong order of preprocessor and compiler flags
- From: Evgeny Grin <k2k@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Checking whether program foo supports option --bar
- From: Sébastien Hinderer <Sebastien.Hinderer@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Checking whether program foo supports option --bar
- From: Peter Johansson <trojkan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Checking whether program foo supports option --bar
- From: Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Checking whether program foo supports option --bar
- From: Sébastien Hinderer <Sebastien.Hinderer@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: portability of xargs
- From: Jacob Bachmeyer <jcb62281@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: portability of xargs
- From: Dan Kegel <dank@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: portability of xargs
- From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: portability of xargs
- From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: portability of xargs
- From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: portability of xargs
- From: Paul Smith <psmith@xxxxxxx>
- Re: portability of xargs
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: portability of xargs
- From: Paul Smith <psmith@xxxxxxx>
- Re: portability of xargs
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: portability of xargs
- From: Nick Bowler <nbowler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: portability of xargs
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: portability of xargs
- From: Daniel Herring <dherring@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: portability of xargs
- From: Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: portability of xargs
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: portability of xargs
- From: Dan Kegel <dank@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: portability of xargs
- From: Daniel Herring <dherring@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: portability of xargs
- From: Alex Ameen <alex.ameen.tx@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: portability of xargs
- From: Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: portability of xargs
- From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: portability of xargs
- From: Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- portability of xargs
- From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: bug#19539: [1.15] AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR should be called early
- From: "Zack Weinberg" <zack@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: support for build-time programs
- From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: support for build-time programs
- From: Alex Ameen <alex.ameen.tx@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: support for build-time programs
- From: "Zack Weinberg" <zack@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- support for build-time programs
- From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@xxxxxxxxxx>
- docs linked https://www.gnu.org/savannah-checkouts/gnu/autoconf/ goes to 2.70
- From: Peter Johansson <trojkan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: abs_top_srcdir broken?
- From: Sébastien Hinderer <Sebastien.Hinderer@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: New libtool maintainer: request for feedback
- From: Alex Ameen <alex.ameen.tx@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: New libtool maintainer: request for feedback
- From: Marko Lindqvist <cazfi74@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: New libtool maintainer: request for feedback
- From: Alex Ameen <alex.ameen.tx@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: New libtool maintainer: request for feedback
- From: Werner LEMBERG <wl@xxxxxxx>
- Re: New libtool maintainer: request for feedback
- From: Alex Ameen <alex.ameen.tx@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: New libtool maintainer: request for feedback
- From: "Zack Weinberg" <zack@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- New libtool maintainer: request for feedback
- From: Alex Ameen <alex.ameen.tx@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: abs_top_srcdir broken?
- From: Sébastien Hinderer <Sebastien.Hinderer@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: abs_top_srcdir broken?
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: abs_top_srcdir broken?
- From: Nick Bowler <nbowler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- abs_top_srcdir broken?
- From: Sébastien Hinderer <Sebastien.Hinderer@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Checking failing dlopen when building 32bit software
- From: alexandre schenberg <ale.schenberg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Making a path absolute portably
- From: Sébastien Hinderer <Sebastien.Hinderer@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Checking failing dlopen when building 32bit software
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Checking failing dlopen when building 32bit software
- From: alexandre schenberg <ale.schenberg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: automake-1.16.5 released [stable]
- From: Kip Warner <kip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: bug#50469: [bison-3.8] bug or side effect to flex & automake
- From: "Zack Weinberg" <zack@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: m4 macro expansion problem
- From: Sébastien Hinderer <Sebastien.Hinderer@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: m4 macro expansion problem
- From: Sébastien Hinderer <Sebastien.Hinderer@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Description not expanded in a call to AC_DEFINE
- From: Sébastien Hinderer <Sebastien.Hinderer@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Description not expanded in a call to AC_DEFINE
- From: Nick Bowler <nbowler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Description not expanded in a call to AC_DEFINE
- From: Sébastien Hinderer <Sebastien.Hinderer@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Description not expanded in a call to AC_DEFINE
- From: Nick Bowler <nbowler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Description not expanded in a call to AC_DEFINE
- From: Sébastien Hinderer <Sebastien.Hinderer@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: m4 macro expansion problem
- From: Peter Johansson <trojkan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: m4 macro expansion problem
- From: "Zack Weinberg" <zack@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: m4 macro expansion problem
- From: Sébastien Hinderer <Sebastien.Hinderer@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: m4 macro expansion problem
- From: "Zack Weinberg" <zack@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: m4 macro expansion problem
- From: Sébastien Hinderer <Sebastien.Hinderer@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: m4 macro expansion problem
- From: Sébastien Hinderer <Sebastien.Hinderer@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: m4 macro expansion problem
- From: Sébastien Hinderer <Sebastien.Hinderer@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: m4 macro expansion problem
- From: Peter Johansson <trojkan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: m4 macro expansion problem
- From: Nick Bowler <nbowler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: m4 macro expansion problem
- From: Nick Bowler <nbowler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- m4 macro expansion problem
- From: Sébastien Hinderer <Sebastien.Hinderer@xxxxxxxx>
- Possible regression in AC_FC_WRAPPERS
- From: Sam James <sam@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Possible regression in AC_FC_WRAPPERS
- From: Michael Orlitzky <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Running autoconf and autoreconf without autotools in the path
- From: Nick Bowler <nbowler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Running autoconf and autoreconf without autotools in the path
- From: Christopher O Cowan <Christopher.O.Cowan@xxxxxxx>
- Running autoconf and autoreconf without autotools in the path
- From: Christopher O Cowan <Christopher.O.Cowan@xxxxxxx>
- Re: AC_CHECK_FUNC vs. function renaming? (curl on tru64/osf1, threads)
- From: Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: AC_CHECK_FUNC vs. function renaming? (curl on tru64/osf1, threads)
- From: Jay K <jayk123@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: AC_CHECK_FUNC vs. function renaming? (curl on tru64/osf1, threads)
- From: Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: AC_CHECK_FUNC vs. function renaming? (curl on tru64/osf1, threads)
- From: Jay K <jayk123@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Autoconf online tutorial
- From: Anthony Scemama <scemama@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Autoconf online tutorial
- From: "David A. Wheeler" <dwheeler@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: AC_CHECK_FUNC vs. function renaming? (curl on tru64/osf1, threads)
- From: Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Autoconf online tutorial
- From: Anthony Scemama <scemama@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- AC_CHECK_FUNC vs. function renaming? (curl on tru64/osf1, threads)
- From: Jay K <jayk123@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Latest M4 fails M4 checks
- From: Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Latest M4 fails M4 checks
- From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: about variable ac_link and gcc
- From: Thomas Jahns <jahns@xxxxxxx>
- Re: about variable ac_link and gcc
- From: Changqing Li <changqing.li@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- about variable ac_link and gcc
- From: Changqing Li <changqing.li@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- about variable ac_link and gcc
- From: Changqing Li <changqing.li@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Force 32 bit build
- From: Ismael Luceno <ismael@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: automake problem with multiple "-rpath"
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: automake problem with multiple "-rpath"
- From: aotto <aotto1968@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: automake problem with multiple "-rpath"
- From: Thomas Jahns <jahns@xxxxxxx>
- Re: automake problem with multiple "-rpath"
- From: aotto <aotto1968@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: automake problem with multiple "-rpath"
- From: Thomas Jahns <jahns@xxxxxxx>
- Re: automake problem with multiple "-rpath"
- From: aotto <aotto1968@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- automake problem with multiple "-rpath"
- From: aotto <aotto1968@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: autoconf-2.71 released [stable]
- From: Eric Blake <eblake@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Force 32 bit build
- From: "Jannick" <thirdedition@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Force 32 bit build
- From: aotto <aotto1968@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to autoconf figure out what library need to be linked to?
- From: Michael Orlitzky <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Force 32 bit build
- From: Thomas Jahns <jahns@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Force 32 bit build
- From: Nick Bowler <nbowler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Force 32 bit build
- From: aotto <aotto1968@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Latest M4 fails M4 checks
- From: Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Latest M4 fails M4 checks
- From: Nick Bowler <nbowler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Latest M4 fails M4 checks
- From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@xxxxxxxxx>
- Latest M4 fails M4 checks
- From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@xxxxxxxxx>
- How to autoconf figure out what library need to be linked to?
- From: Peng Yu <pengyu.ut@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Knut Petersen] [PATCH] fix broken building of guile branch "branch_release-1-8"
- From: Thien-Thi Nguyen <ttn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to "bake in" configure args
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to "bake in" configure args
- From: "Dan Mahoney (Gushi)" <danm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to "bake in" configure args
- From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to "bake in" configure args
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: libtool wrapper
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to "bake in" configure args
- From: Dan Mahoney <danm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- libtool wrapper
- From: "Dan Mahoney (Gushi)" <danm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to "bake in" configure args
- From: Gavin Smith <gavinsmith0123@xxxxxxxxx>
- How to "bake in" configure args
- From: "Dan Mahoney (Gushi)" <danm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [Knut Petersen] [PATCH] fix broken building of guile branch "branch_release-1-8"
- From: Thien-Thi Nguyen <ttn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to check for a #DEFINE?
- From: Václav Haisman <vhaisman@xxxxxxxxx>
- How to check for a #DEFINE?
- From: Dan Mahoney <danm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to properly check for -lresolv and resolv.h
- From: Dan Mahoney <danm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to properly check for -lresolv and resolv.h
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- How to properly check for -lresolv and resolv.h
- From: "Dan Mahoney (Gushi)" <danm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Issue with AC 2.69 (FreeBSD) and recent changes to make us more compatible with 2.70
- From: "Dan Mahoney (Gushi)" <danm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: config.sub/config.guess using nonportable $(...) substitutions
- From: Karl Berry <karl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: config.sub/config.guess using nonportable $(...) substitutions
- From: "David A. Wheeler" <dwheeler@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: config.sub/config.guess using nonportable $(...) substitutions
- From: Russ Allbery <eagle@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: config.sub/config.guess using nonportable $(...) substitutions
- From: Warren Young <warren@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: config.sub/config.guess using nonportable $(...) substitutions
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: config.sub/config.guess using nonportable $(...) substitutions
- From: Nick Bowler <nbowler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: config.sub/config.guess using nonportable $(...) substitutions
- From: Tim Rice <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: config.sub/config.guess using nonportable $(...) substitutions
- From: Michael Orlitzky <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: config.sub/config.guess using nonportable $(...) substitutions
- From: "Todd C. Miller" <Todd.Miller@xxxxxxx>
- Re: config.sub/config.guess using nonportable $(...) substitutions
- From: Warren Young <warren@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: config.sub/config.guess using nonportable $(...) substitutions
- From: Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: config.sub/config.guess using nonportable $(...) substitutions
- From: Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: config.sub/config.guess using nonportable $(...) substitutions
- From: Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: config.sub/config.guess using nonportable $(...) substitutions
- From: Karl Berry <karl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: config.sub/config.guess using nonportable $(...) substitutions
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: config.sub/config.guess using nonportable $(...) substitutions
- From: Nick Bowler <nbowler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: config.sub/config.guess using nonportable $(...) substitutions
- From: Tim Rice <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: config.sub/config.guess using nonportable $(...) substitutions
- From: Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: config.sub/config.guess using nonportable $(...) substitutions
- From: Karl Berry <karl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: config.sub/config.guess using nonportable $(...) substitutions
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: config.sub/config.guess using nonportable $(...) substitutions
- From: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- config.sub/config.guess using nonportable $(...) substitutions
- From: Nick Bowler <nbowler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: sys/time.h and time.h
- From: Thien-Thi Nguyen <ttn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: sys/time.h and time.h
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- sys/time.h and time.h
- From: Thien-Thi Nguyen <ttn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Version 2.72a fails with libarchive git version
- From: Werner LEMBERG <wl@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC: Bump minimum Perl to 5.18.0 for next major release of both Autoconf and Automake
- From: Nick Bowler <nbowler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC: Bump minimum Perl to 5.18.0 for next major release of both Autoconf and Automake
- From: Karl Berry <karl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC: Bump minimum Perl to 5.18.0 for next major release of both Autoconf and Automake
- From: alexandre schenberg <ale.schenberg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC: Bump minimum Perl to 5.18.0 for next major release of both Autoconf and Automake
- From: Nick Bowler <nbowler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC: Bump minimum Perl to 5.18.0 for next major release of both Autoconf and Automake
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC: Bump minimum Perl to 5.18.0 for next major release of both Autoconf and Automake
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: AC_PROG_CC: how to distinguish clnag from gcc?
- From: Sébastien Hinderer <Sebastien.Hinderer@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: AC_PROG_CC: how to distinguish clnag from gcc?
- From: Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: AC_PROG_CC: how to distinguish clnag from gcc?
- From: Russ Allbery <eagle@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: AC_PROG_CC: how to distinguish clnag from gcc?
- From: Sébastien Hinderer <Sebastien.Hinderer@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: AC_PROG_CC: how to distinguish clang from gcc?
- From: Sébastien Hinderer <Sebastien.Hinderer@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: AC_PROG_CC: how to distinguish clang from gcc?
- From: Russ Allbery <eagle@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: AC_PROG_CC: how to distinguish clnag from gcc?
- From: Russ Allbery <eagle@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: AC_PROG_CC: how to distinguish clang from gcc?
- From: "David A. Wheeler" <dwheeler@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: AC_PROG_CC: how to distinguish clnag from gcc?
- From: "David A. Wheeler" <dwheeler@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: AC_PROG_CC: how to distinguish clnag from gcc?
- From: Sébastien Hinderer <Sebastien.Hinderer@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: AC_PROG_CC: how to distinguish clnag from gcc?
- From: "Todd C. Miller" <Todd.Miller@xxxxxxx>
- AC_PROG_CC: how to distinguish clnag from gcc?
- From: Sébastien Hinderer <Sebastien.Hinderer@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Weird behaviour about system types
- From: Sébastien Hinderer <Sebastien.Hinderer@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Weird behaviour about system types
- From: Nick Bowler <nbowler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Weird behaviour about system types
- From: Sébastien Hinderer <Sebastien.Hinderer@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Weird behaviour about system types
- From: Nick Bowler <nbowler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Weird behaviour about system types
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Weird behaviour about system types
- From: Sébastien Hinderer <Sebastien.Hinderer@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Weird behaviour about system types
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Weird behaviour about system types
- From: Sébastien Hinderer <Sebastien.Hinderer@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Automake's file locking
- From: Nick Bowler <nbowler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Automake's file locking
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: M4 stock macros
- From: DUDZIAK Krzysztof <krzysztof.dudziak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: couple notes about post-2.71 branch management
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Automake's file locking
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: couple notes about post-2.71 branch management
- From: Nick Bowler <nbowler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Procedure for adding new target
- From: connor horman <chorman64@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Procedure for adding new target
- From: Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Procedure for adding new target
- From: connor horman <chorman64@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Future plans for Autotools
- From: Gavin Smith <gavinsmith0123@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Future plans for Autotools
- From: Gavin Smith <gavinsmith0123@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: version string comparison
- From: Thien-Thi Nguyen <ttn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: version string comparison
- From: Nick Bowler <nbowler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- version string comparison
- From: Thien-Thi Nguyen <ttn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC: Bump minimum Perl to 5.18.0 for next major release of both Autoconf and Automake
- From: Karl Berry <karl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC: Bump minimum Perl to 5.18.0 for next major release of both Autoconf and Automake
- From: Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- RFC: Bump minimum Perl to 5.18.0 for next major release of both Autoconf and Automake
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- couple notes about post-2.71 branch management
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Future plans for Autotools
- From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- NFS file locking (was: Re: Automake's file locking (was Re: Autoconf/Automake is not using version from AC_INIT))
- From: pluto--- via Discussion list for the autoconf build system <autoconf@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Autoconf version number after 2.70
- From: John Calcote <john.calcote@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Automake's file locking
- From: Bruno Haible <bruno@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Autoconf version number after 2.70
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- autoconf-2.71 released [stable]
- From: zackw@xxxxxxxxx (Zack Weinberg)
- Re: Parallel configure
- From: Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Automake's file locking (was Re: Autoconf/Automake is not using version from AC_INIT)
- From: Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Automake's file locking (was Re: Autoconf/Automake is not using version from AC_INIT)
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Automake's file locking (was Re: Autoconf/Automake is not using version from AC_INIT)
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Automake's file locking (was Re: Autoconf/Automake is not using version from AC_INIT)
- From: Nick Bowler <nbowler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Parallel configure
- From: Gavin Smith <gavinsmith0123@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Automake's file locking (was Re: Autoconf/Automake is not using version from AC_INIT)
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: M4 stock macros
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Automake's file locking (was Re: Autoconf/Automake is not using version from AC_INIT)
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Automake's file locking (was Re: Autoconf/Automake is not using version from AC_INIT)
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- M4 stock macros
- From: DUDZIAK Krzysztof <krzysztof.dudziak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Parallel configure
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Parallel configure
- From: Gavin Smith <gavinsmith0123@xxxxxxxxx>
- Parallel configure
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Future plans for Autotools
- From: Karl Berry <karl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Future plans for Autotools
- From: Joseph Myers <joseph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Future plans for Autotools
- From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Future plans for Autotools
- From: Joseph Myers <joseph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Future plans for Autotools
- From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Future plans for Autotools
- From: Paul Smith <psmith@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Future plans for Autotools
- From: Paul Smith <psmith@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Future plans for Autotools
- From: Andy Tai <atai@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Future plans for Autotools
- From: Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Future plans for Autotools
- From: Gavin Smith <gavinsmith0123@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Future plans for Autotools
- From: Gavin Smith <gavinsmith0123@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Future plans for Autotools
- From: Nick Bowler <nbowler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Future plans for Autotools
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Future plans for Autotools
- From: Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Future plans for Autotools
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Future plans for Autotools
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Future plans for Autotools
- From: Paul Smith <psmith@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Future plans for Autotools
- From: John Calcote <john.calcote@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Future plans for Autotools
- From: Nick Bowler <nbowler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Automake's file locking (was Re: Autoconf/Automake is not using version from AC_INIT)
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Confusing behavior with autoreconf and gettext in the openzfs project
- From: Eli Schwartz <eschwartz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Future plans for Autotools
- From: "David A. Wheeler" <dwheeler@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Confusing behavior with autoreconf and gettext in the openzfs project
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Confusing behavior with autoreconf and gettext in the openzfs project
- From: Eli Schwartz <eschwartz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Future plans for Autotools
- From: Paul Smith <psmith@xxxxxxx>
- Automake's file locking (was Re: Autoconf/Automake is not using version from AC_INIT)
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Future plans for Autotools
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Autoconf/Automake is not using version from AC_INIT
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Autoconf/Automake is not using version from AC_INIT
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Future plans for Autotools
- From: Paul Smith <psmith@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Autoconf/Automake is not using version from AC_INIT
- From: Nick Bowler <nbowler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Autoconf/Automake is not using version from AC_INIT
- From: Peter Johansson <trojkan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Autoconf/Automake is not using version from AC_INIT
- From: Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Autoconf/Automake is not using version from AC_INIT
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Autoconf/Automake is not using version from AC_INIT
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Autoconf/Automake is not using version from AC_INIT
- From: Peter Johansson <trojkan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Autoconf/Automake is not using version from AC_INIT
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Autoconf/Automake is not using version from AC_INIT
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Autoconf/Automake is not using version from AC_INIT
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Future plans for Autotools
- From: Kip Warner <kip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Future plans for Autotools
- From: Eli Schwartz <eschwartz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Future plans for Autotools
- From: Nick Bowler <nbowler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Future plans for Autotools
- From: John Calcote <john.calcote@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Future plans for Autotools
- From: Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Future plans for Autotools
- From: Andy Tai <atai@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Future plans for Autotools
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Future plans for Autotools
- From: pluto--- via Discussion list for the autoconf build system <autoconf@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Future plans for Autotools
- From: John Calcote <john.calcote@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Future plans for Autotools
- From: Gavin Smith <gavinsmith0123@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Future plans for Autotools
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Building a cross-compiler
- From: Sébastien Hinderer <Sebastien.Hinderer@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Building a cross-compiler
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Building a cross-compiler
- From: Sébastien Hinderer <Sebastien.Hinderer@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Future plans for Autotools
- From: Nate Bargmann <n0nb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Future plans for Autotools
- From: Kip Warner <kip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Future plans for Autotools
- From: Nate Bargmann <n0nb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Future plans for Autotools
- From: Dan Kegel <dank@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Future plans for Autotools
- From: Andy Tai <atai@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Future plans for Autotools
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Future plans for Autotools
- From: Gavin Smith <gavinsmith0123@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Future plans for Autotools
- From: Dan Kegel <dank@xxxxxxxxx>
- Future plans for Autotools
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Building a cross-compiler
- From: Nick Bowler <nbowler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Building a cross-compiler
- From: Sébastien Hinderer <Sebastien.Hinderer@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Expansion of @libexecdir@ in .desktop.in file includes ${exec_prefix}
- From: Stefan Koch <stefan.koch10@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Expansion of @libexecdir@ in .desktop.in file includes ${exec_prefix}
- From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Expansion of @libexecdir@ in .desktop.in file includes ${exec_prefix}
- From: Nick Bowler <nbowler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Expansion of @libexecdir@ in .desktop.in file includes ${exec_prefix}
- From: Eli Schwartz <eschwartz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Expansion of @libexecdir@ in .desktop.in file includes ${exec_prefix}
- From: Nick Bowler <nbowler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Expansion of @libexecdir@ in .desktop.in file includes ${exec_prefix}
- From: Stefan Koch <stefan.koch10@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LIBS or LDLIBS ?
- From: "Kaz Kylheku (gmake)" <729-670-0061@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LIBS or LDLIBS ?
- From: Sébastien Hinderer <Sebastien.Hinderer@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Autoconf/Automake is not using version from AC_INIT
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LIBS or LDLIBS ?
- From: Paul Smith <psmith@xxxxxxx>
- Re: LIBS or LDLIBS ?
- From: Sébastien Hinderer <Sebastien.Hinderer@xxxxxxxx>
- LIBS or LDLIBS ?
- From: Sébastien Hinderer <Sebastien.Hinderer@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Autoconf/Automake is not using version from AC_INIT
- From: Peter Johansson <trojkan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Autoconf/Automake is not using version from AC_INIT
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Autoconf/Automake is not using version from AC_INIT
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Autoconf/Automake is not using version from AC_INIT
- From: Peter Johansson <trojkan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Autoconf/Automake is not using version from AC_INIT
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Autoconf/Automake is not using version from AC_INIT
- From: Peter Johansson <trojkan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Autoconf/Automake is not using version from AC_INIT
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: shell or M4sugar?
- From: Julien ÉLIE <julien@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: shell or M4sugar?
- From: Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: shell or M4sugar?
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: shell or M4sugar?
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- shell or M4sugar?
- From: Julien ÉLIE <julien@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Autoconf version number after 2.70
- From: John Calcote <john.calcote@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Autoconf version number after 2.70
- From: Eli Schwartz <eschwartz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Autoconf version number after 2.70
- From: Karl Berry <karl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: AC_INIT produces unexpected "PACKAGE" and "VERSION" strings in config.h
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- AC_INIT produces unexpected "PACKAGE" and "VERSION" strings in config.h
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Getting srcdir in script executed using m4_esyscmd in AC_INIT
- From: Nick Bowler <nbowler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Getting srcdir in script executed using m4_esyscmd in AC_INIT
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Autoconf version number after 2.70
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Getting srcdir in script executed using m4_esyscmd in AC_INIT
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Getting srcdir in script executed using m4_esyscmd in AC_INIT
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Getting srcdir in script executed using m4_esyscmd in AC_INIT
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Getting srcdir in script executed using m4_esyscmd in AC_INIT
- From: Tim Rice <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Getting srcdir in script executed using m4_esyscmd in AC_INIT
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Confusing behavior with autoreconf and gettext in the openzfs project
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Confusing behavior with autoreconf and gettext in the openzfs project
- From: Eli Schwartz <eschwartz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Autoconf version number after 2.70
- From: Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Confusing behavior with autoreconf and gettext in the openzfs project
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Disable the generation of back up ~ files
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Autoconf version number after 2.70
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Request to revert the C version change
- From: Ross Burton <ross@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Getting srcdir in script executed using m4_esyscmd in AC_INIT
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Getting srcdir in script executed using m4_esyscmd in AC_INIT
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Getting srcdir in script executed using m4_esyscmd in AC_INIT
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Autoconf version number after 2.70
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Disable the generation of back up ~ files
- From: nu quaquaraqua <nuquaquaraqua@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Autoconf version number after 2.70
- From: Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Autoconf version number after 2.70
- From: Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Autoconf version number after 2.70
- From: Marko Lindqvist <cazfi74@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Autoconf version number after 2.70
- From: "David A. Wheeler" <dwheeler@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Autoconf version number after 2.70
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Confusing behavior with autoreconf and gettext in the openzfs project
- From: Eli Schwartz <eschwartz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Autoconf version number after 2.70
- From: Julien ÉLIE <julien@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Autoconf version number after 2.70
- From: Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gnulib / autoconf sync
- From: Bruno Haible <bruno@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gnulib / autoconf sync
- From: Bruno Haible <bruno@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Request to revert the C version change
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Configure.in can't detect Xft libraries.
- From: alexandre schenberg <ale.schenberg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Configure.in can't detect Xft libraries.
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Configure.in can't detect Xft libraries.
- From: alexandre schenberg <ale.schenberg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Reautoconfing
- From: Wookey <wookey@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Reautoconfing
- From: Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Reautoconfing
- From: Wookey <wookey@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Request to revert the C version change
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Request to revert the C version change
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Request to revert the C version change
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Request to revert the C version change
- From: Ross Burton <ross@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Request to revert the C version change
- From: Bruno Haible <bruno@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Request to revert the C version change
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Request to revert the C version change
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Request to revert the C version change
- From: "Todd C. Miller" <Todd.Miller@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Request to revert the C version change
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Request to revert the C version change
- From: "Todd C. Miller" <Todd.Miller@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Request to revert the C version change
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Request to revert the C version change
- From: Ross Burton <ross@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Request to revert the C version change
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Request to revert the C version change
- From: Ross Burton <ross@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.70 release branch created; trunk open for development
- From: Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: autoconf-2.70 released [stable]
- From: Gavin Smith <gavinsmith0123@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.70 release branch created; trunk open for development
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.70 release branch created; trunk open for development
- From: Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Hidden files in autoconf 2.70 distribution?
- From: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Hidden files in autoconf 2.70 distribution?
- From: Jim Meyering <jim@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Hidden files in autoconf 2.70 distribution?
- From: Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Hidden files in autoconf 2.70 distribution?
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Hidden files in autoconf 2.70 distribution?
- From: Bruno Haible <bruno@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Hidden files in autoconf 2.70 distribution?
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Hidden files in autoconf 2.70 distribution?
- From: Bruce Korb <bkorb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Hidden files in autoconf 2.70 distribution?
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- 2.70 release branch created; trunk open for development
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Hidden files in autoconf 2.70 distribution?
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Hidden files in autoconf 2.70 distribution?
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: autoconf-2.70 released [stable]
- From: John Calcote <john.calcote@xxxxxxxxx>
- autoconf-2.70 released [stable]
- From: zackw@xxxxxxxxx (Zack Weinberg)
- Re: autoconf-2.69e released [2.70 RELEASE CANDIDATE]
- From: John Calcote <john.calcote@xxxxxxxxx>
- autoconf-2.69e released [2.70 RELEASE CANDIDATE]
- Autoconf release status update for 2020-11-16; call for help
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Change in gettext behaviour
- From: Ross Burton <ross@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Weird failure with autoconf 2.69c in gmp
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Weird failure with autoconf 2.69c in gmp
- From: Ross Burton <ross@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Autoconf release status update for 2020-11-09
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Apply fix for AM_GNU_GETTEXT_REQUIRE_VERSION
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Apply fix for AM_GNU_GETTEXT_REQUIRE_VERSION
- From: Nicholas Guriev <nicholas@xxxxxxxxx>
- Fallout from _AC_UNDECLARED_WARNING in autoconf 2.70beta
- From: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- autoconf-2.69d released [beta]
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Autoconf 2.70 release status update as of 2020-11-02
- From: Lars Wendler <polynomial-c@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Autoconf 2.70 release status update as of 2020-11-02
- From: Michael Orlitzky <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Autoconf 2.70 release status update as of 2020-11-02
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] similar treatment for CYGWIN and MSYS2
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [autoconf 2.69c] test 36: autoupdating AC_OBSOLETE fails when configure reads config.site
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [autoconf 2.69c] test 36: autoupdating AC_OBSOLETE fails when configure reads config.site
- From: "Jannick" <thirdedition@xxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH] similar treatment for CYGWIN and MSYS2
- From: "Jannick" <thirdedition@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] similar treatment for CYGWIN and MSYS2
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- [autoconf 2.69c] test 36: autoupdating AC_OBSOLETE fails when configure reads config.site
- From: "Jannick" <thirdedition@xxxxxxx>
- Re: determine base type of a typedef
- From: Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: determine base type of a typedef
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] similar treatment for CYGWIN and MSYS2
- From: "Jannick" <thirdedition@xxxxxxx>
- RE: Debian archive rebuild with Autoconf 2.69c
- From: "Jannick" <thirdedition@xxxxxxx>
- Re: determine base type of a typedef
- From: Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: determine base type of a typedef
- From: Anatoli <me@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: determine base type of a typedef
- From: Anatoli <me@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Debian archive rebuild with Autoconf 2.69c
- Re: determine base type of a typedef
- From: Nick Bowler <nbowler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: determine base type of a typedef
- From: Nick Bowler <nbowler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: determine base type of a typedef
- From: Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: determine base type of a typedef
- From: Peter Johansson <trojkan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: determine base type of a typedef
- From: Anatoli <me@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: determine base type of a typedef
- From: Anatoli <me@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: determine base type of a typedef
- From: Russell Shaw <rjshaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: determine base type of a typedef
- From: Russell Shaw <rjshaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: determine base type of a typedef
- From: Anatoli <me@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: determine base type of a typedef
- From: Russell Shaw <rjshaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: determine base type of a typedef
- From: Vivien Kraus <vivien@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: determine base type of a typedef
- From: Anatoli <me@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: determine base type of a typedef
- From: Russell Shaw <rjshaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- determine base type of a typedef
- From: Anatoli <me@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Weird failure with autoconf 2.69c in gmp
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: autoconf-2.69c Gentoo tinderbox run
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- autoconf-2.69c Gentoo tinderbox run
- From: Michael Orlitzky <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: AC_PATH_X and friends explicitly look into /usr/lib
- From: Ross Burton <ross@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: AC_PATH_X and friends explicitly look into /usr/lib
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- AC_PATH_X and friends explicitly look into /usr/lib
- From: Ross Burton <ross@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Weird failure with autoconf 2.69c in gmp
- From: Ross Burton <ross@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Exactly when does autoconf enter cross-compilation mode? (documentation)
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Weird failure with autoconf 2.69c in gmp
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Weird failure with autoconf 2.69c in gmp
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Weird failure with autoconf 2.69c in gmp
- From: Nick Bowler <nbowler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Weird failure with autoconf 2.69c in gmp
- From: Ross Burton <ross@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Weird failure with autoconf 2.69c in gmp
- From: Ross Burton <ross@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Weird failure with autoconf 2.69c in gmp
- From: Ross Burton <ross@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Weird failure with autoconf 2.69c in gmp
- From: Nick Bowler <nbowler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Weird failure with autoconf 2.69c in gmp
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Weird failure with autoconf 2.69c in gmp
- From: Ross Burton <ross@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Licensing of Autoconf
- From: Eric Blake <eblake@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Licensing of Autoconf
- From: Jack Pearson <jackrpearson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Exactly when does autoconf enter cross-compilation mode? (documentation)
- Re: Debian archive rebuild with Autoconf 2.69c
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Debian archive rebuild with Autoconf 2.69c
- From: Ben Pfaff <blp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: verifying autoconf-2.69c.tar.xz.sig
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: verifying autoconf-2.69c.tar.xz.sig
- From: Thien-Thi Nguyen <ttn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: verifying autoconf-2.69c.tar.xz.sig
- From: Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: verifying autoconf-2.69c.tar.xz.sig
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: verifying autoconf-2.69c.tar.xz.sig
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: verifying autoconf-2.69c.tar.xz.sig
- From: Andreas Kusalananda Kähäri <andreas.kahari@xxxxxx>
- Re: verifying autoconf-2.69c.tar.xz.sig
- From: Thien-Thi Nguyen <ttn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- verifying autoconf-2.69c.tar.xz.sig
- From: Thien-Thi Nguyen <ttn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: autoconf-2.69c released [beta]
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: autoconf-2.69c released [beta]
- From: Eric Blake <eblake@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: autoconf-2.69c released [beta]
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: autoconf-2.69c released [beta]
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: autoconf-2.69c released [beta]
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: autoconf-2.69c released [beta]
- From: Russ Allbery <eagle@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: autoconf-2.69c released [beta]
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: autoconf-2.69c released [beta]
- From: Bruno Haible <bruno@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Results from running autoupdate on gnulib m4 files
- From: Bruno Haible <bruno@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: autoconf-2.69c released [beta]
- From: Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: autoconf-2.69c released [beta]
- From: Bruno Haible <bruno@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: autoconf-2.69c released [beta]
- From: Gavin Smith <gavinsmith0123@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: autoconf-2.69c released [beta]
- From: Gavin Smith <gavinsmith0123@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: autoconf-2.69c released [beta]
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: autoconf-2.69c released [beta]
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: autoconf-2.69c released [beta]
- From: Gavin Smith <gavinsmith0123@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: autoconf-2.69c released [beta]
- From: Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: autoconf-2.69c released [beta]
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: autoconf-2.69c released [beta]
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Results from running autoupdate on gnulib m4 files
- From: Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Debian archive rebuild with Autoconf 2.69c
- From: Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: autoconf's -I flag in simple configure.ac cases
- From: "Jannick" <thirdedition@xxxxxxx>
- Re: autoconf's -I flag in simple configure.ac cases
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- autoconf's -I flag in simple configure.ac cases
- From: "Jannick" <thirdedition@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Results from running autoupdate on gnulib m4 files
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: autoconf-2.69c released [beta]
- From: Bruno Haible <bruno@xxxxxxxxx>
- Results from running autoupdate on gnulib m4 files
- From: Gavin Smith <gavinsmith0123@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: autoconf-2.69c released [beta]
- From: Gavin Smith <gavinsmith0123@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: autoconf-2.69c released [beta]
- From: Gavin Smith <gavinsmith0123@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: autoconf-2.69c released [beta]
- From: Gavin Smith <gavinsmith0123@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: autoconf-2.69c released [beta]
- From: Bruno Haible <bruno@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: autoconf-2.69c released [beta]
- From: Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: autoconf-2.69c released [beta]
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Debian archive rebuild with Autoconf 2.69c
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Debian archive rebuild with Autoconf 2.69c
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: autoconf-2.69c released [beta]
- From: Gavin Smith <gavinsmith0123@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: autoconf-2.69c released [beta]
- From: Gavin Smith <gavinsmith0123@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Debian archive rebuild with Autoconf 2.69c
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Debian archive rebuild with Autoconf 2.69c
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Debian archive rebuild with Autoconf 2.69c
- From: Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Debian archive rebuild with Autoconf 2.69c
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- autoconf-2.69c released [beta]
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Warning category skew between Autoconf and Automake - workaround in autoreconf?
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Warning category skew between Autoconf and Automake - workaround in autoreconf?
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Warning category skew between Autoconf and Automake - workaround in autoreconf?
- From: Karl Berry <karl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Warning category skew between Autoconf and Automake - workaround in autoreconf?
- From: Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Warning category skew between Autoconf and Automake - workaround in autoreconf?
- From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Warning category skew between Autoconf and Automake - workaround in autoreconf?
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] Ensure standard file descriptors are open on start
- From: Nick Bowler <nbowler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] Ensure standard file descriptors are open on start
- From: Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] Ensure standard file descriptors are open on start
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Exactly when does autoconf enter cross-compilation mode?
- From: Nick Bowler <nbowler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Exactly when does autoconf enter cross-compilation mode?
- Re: Exactly when does autoconf enter cross-compilation mode?
- From: Nick Bowler <nbowler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Exactly when does autoconf enter cross-compilation mode?
- Re: autoconf-2.69b released [beta]
- From: Joshua Branson via Discussion list for the autoconf build system <autoconf@xxxxxxx>
- Re: autoconf-2.69b released [beta]
- From: John Calcote <john.calcote@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: autoconf-2.69b released [beta]
- From: Joshua Branson via Discussion list for the autoconf build system <autoconf@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Knowing which tool is being run, from M4
- From: Eric Blake <eblake@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Knowing which tool is being run, from M4
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Who's the upstream owner of GNUmakefile?
- From: Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Who's the upstream owner of GNUmakefile?
- From: Eric Blake <eblake@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Who's the upstream owner of GNUmakefile?
- From: Eric Blake <eblake@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Who's the upstream owner of GNUmakefile?
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: feedback on 2.69b
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
[Index of Archives]
[GCC Help]
[Security]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Linux Crypto]