Re: bool and C23

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: bug-gnulib@xxxxxxx, Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: bool and C23
From: Bruno Haible <bruno@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2022 13:30:20 +0200
Cc: Zack Weinberg <zack@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, autoconf@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <9a69df60-acfe-a4d5-0e5c-60ed94d8e02c@cs.ucla.edu>
References: <9f312df7-f62d-1861-1d09-37b554359f7a@cs.ucla.edu> <7425977.EvYhyI6sBW@nimes> <9a69df60-acfe-a4d5-0e5c-60ed94d8e02c@cs.ucla.edu>

Paul Eggert wrote:
> OK, attached is a revised Gnulib proposed patchset that does that.

Looks all good to me. Great work, Paul!

I'm starting portability tests of it now...

Bruno

Follow-Ups:
- Re: bool and C23
  - From: Bruno Haible

References:
- bool and C23
  - From: Paul Eggert
- Re: bool and C23
  - From: Bruno Haible
- Re: bool and C23
  - From: Paul Eggert

Prev by Date: Re: bool and C23
Next by Date: Re: bool and C23
Previous by thread: Re: bool and C23
Next by thread: Re: bool and C23
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [GCC Help] [Kernel Discussion] [RPM Discussion] [Red Hat Development] [Yosemite News] [Linux USB] [Samba]

Powered by Linux