On Samstag, 10. September 2022 06:43:06 CEST Paul Eggert wrote: > On 9/9/22 04:14, Bruno Haible wrote: > > I would suggest to keep*one* module, and keep it named 'stdbool'. > > Its meaning will be "provide bool, true, false according to the standards". > > It can invoke AC_HEADER_STDBOOL and AC_C_BOOL under the hood. > > The important point is that the migration from older to newer ISO standard > > versions is transparent (not troublesome) for the Gnulib user. > > OK, attached is a revised Gnulib proposed patchset that does that. It > changes stdbool to assume C99 (since that should be safe now), which > means stdbool no longer needs to use AC_HEADER_STDBOOL. It moves the old > stdbool stuff into a new module 'stdbool-c99' that's already marked > obsolescent, in case someone still needs to port to pre-C99 compilers > for some reason. The documentation has a mistake: $ make gnulib.html date -u -r gnulib-readme.texi +"@set UPDATED %F %T" > updated-stamp env LANG= LC_MESSAGES= LC_ALL= LANGUAGE= makeinfo --no-split --reference-limit=2000 --html -o gnulib.html gnulib.texi gnulib-readme.texi:370: @xref reference to nonexistent node `c-bool' make: *** [Makefile:24: gnulib.html] Error 1 Fix: s/c-bool/stdbool.h/g Bruno
