Hi, I noticed that config.sub (and config.guess) scripts were very recently changed to use the POSIX $(...) form for command substitutions. This change is, I fear, ill-advised. The POSIX construction is widely understood to be nonportable as it is not supported by traditional Bourne shells such as, for example, Solaris 10 /bin/sh. This specific portability problem is discussed in the Autoconf manual for portable shell programming[1]. These scripts using $(...) are incorporated into the recently-released Automake 1.16.3, which means they get copied into packages bootstrapped with this version. So now, if I create a package using the latest bits, configuring with heirloom-sh fails: % CONFIG_SHELL=/bin/jsh jsh ./configure CONFIG_SHELL=/bin/jsh configure: error: cannot run /bin/jsh ./config.sub % jsh config.sub x86_64-pc-linux-gnu config.sub: syntax error at line 53: `me=$' unexpected (The heirloom-sh is essentially Solaris /bin/sh but runs on GNU/Linux systems). What was the motivation for this change? Backquotes work fine and are more portable. Can we just revert it so the script works again with traditional shells? Surely these scripts should be maximally portable, I would think? [1] https://www.gnu.org/savannah-checkouts/gnu/autoconf/manual/autoconf-2.70/autoconf.html#index-_0024_0028commands_0029 Cheers, Nick
