On Mon, 2022-06-13 at 15:39 -0700, Paul Eggert wrote: > > I've wanted something like this for *years* (I assigned a simpler > version to my undergraduates but of course it was too much to expect > them to implement it) and I hope some sort of parallelization like this > can get into production with Bash at some point (or some other shell if > Bash can't use this idea). > It looks like PaSh itself was designed and built well. The authors use multiple test suites and PaSh is comparable to other shells in correctness. Ultimately you wouldn't want a runtime dependency on python in your /bin/sh, but as a first step... can PaSh run ./configure already?
