On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 4:21 PM Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 9:31 AM Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > After thinking about it a bit more, this technical argument against > > three-part versions is quite compelling ... but I still find the > > marketing argument *for* three-part versions to be quite compelling. > > I would like to hear some more people's opinions; cc:ing Eric and > > Karl. > > After a bunch more thought, I went with 2.71 for the patch release > (from the branch) that I just uploaded. If we were doing releases as often as we should, you’d be putting out a 2.71 in a couple of months anyway. I’d say you’re just right on schedule. J-
