Re: automake problem with multiple "-rpath"

[Thomas Jahns <jahns@xxxxxxx>]

On 5/10/21 7:14 PM, aotto wrote:
> To be honest I don't want to set the -rpath at all…
>
> what I have :
>
> #1 libtclreadline.so depend on libreadline.so
> #2 everything is in the SAME directory
> #3 the directory is already KNOWN to ld.so
>
>  > ls -ald *readline*
> -rw-r--r-- 1 dev1usr users 478680 29. Apr 22:28 libreadline.a
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 dev1usr users     18 29. Apr 22:28 libreadline.so -> 
> libreadline.so.4.0
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 dev1usr users     18 29. Apr 22:28 libreadline.so.4 -> 
> libreadline.so.4.0
> -rw-r--r-- 1 dev1usr users 432556 29. Apr 22:28 libreadline.so.4.0
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 dev1usr users  67656 10. Mai 18:55 libtclreadline-3.0.0.so
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 dev1usr users   1109 10. Mai 18:55 libtclreadline.la
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 dev1usr users     23 10. Mai 18:55 libtclreadline.so -> 
> libtclreadline-3.0.0.so
>
> ------------------------------------------
>
> important :
>
> libtclreadline.so -> libtclreadline-3.0.0.so and
>
> libreadline.so -> libreadline.so.4.0
>
> error:
>
> libreadline.so.4.0 not found
>
> --------------------------------------------
>
> The EXE dlopen "libtclreadline" and the FIRST soft-link to 
> "libtclreadline-3.0.0.so" is resolved and
> "libtclreadline-3.0.0.so" is dlopend'd, but the "libtclreadline.so" 
> depend on "libreadline.so" this
> is a link to "libreadline.so.4.0"

What does

ldd libtclreadline.so

give?

Regards, Thomas

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature