RE: [PATCH] similar treatment for CYGWIN and MSYS2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 11:09:12 -0400, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 10:18 AM Jannick <thirdedition@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Attached for your consideration a patch such that MSYS2 and CYGWIN are
> > treated the same.
> 
> Merged, thank you.
> 
> > --- a/lib/autoconf/fortran.m4
> > +++ b/lib/autoconf/fortran.m4
> > @@ -666,7 +666,7 @@ while test $[@%:@] != 1; do
> >           ;;
> >         -lkernel32)
> >           case $host_os in
> > -         *cygwin*) ;;
> > +         *cygwin* | *msys* ) ;;
> >           *)
> > ac_cv_[]_AC_LANG_ABBREV[]_libs="$ac_cv_[]_AC_LANG_ABBREV[]_libs
> > $ac_arg"
> 
> Should we have mingw* here too?

An amendment for mingw* I have not seen so far.  Maybe someone else could weigh in here? 






[Index of Archives]     [GCC Help]     [Kernel Discussion]     [RPM Discussion]     [Red Hat Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux USB]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux