IETF Discussion

• Thread Index

• Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: RTBF, was IETF subpoena processes update and a request
  • From: John Levine
• Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-04.txt> (Path MTU Discovery for IP version 6) to Internet Standard
  • From: Gorry Fairhurst
• Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request
  • From: Joe Touch
• IAOC membership (was: Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request)
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request
  • From: John Levine
• Review of draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp-22
  • From: Carlos Pignataro
• IESG summary report
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request
  • From: Scott O. Bradner
• Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request
  • From: Scott Bradner
• Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request
  • From: Randy Bush
• RE: IETF subpoena processes update and a request
  • From: Michael Cameron
• Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request
  • From: Scott Bradner
• RE: IETF subpoena processes update and a request
  • From: Michael Cameron
• Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request
  • From: Scott Bradner
• Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request
  • From: Randy Bush
• IETF-98 Highlights
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request
  • From: Angela
• IETF subpoena processes update and a request
  • From: IETF Chair
• RE: Review of draft-ietf-trill-p2mp-bfd-04
  • From: Zhangmingui (Martin)
• RE: [RTG-DIR] Review of draft-ietf-trill-p2mp-bfd-04
  • From: Susan Hares
• Review of draft-ietf-trill-p2mp-bfd-04
  • From: Carlos Pignataro
• Re: Bad Attitude PechaKucha in Chicago -- Schedule & location
  • From: Aaron Falk
• Bad Attitude PechaKucha in Chicago -- Schedule & location
  • From: Aaron Falk
• Re: Video Streaming Bar BoF @ IETF98
  • From: Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal)
• FW: Video Streaming Bar BoF @ IETF98
  • From: Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal)
• Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted-04.txt> (A SIP Response Code for Unwanted Calls) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Cullen Jennings
• Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted-04.txt> (A SIP Response Code for Unwanted Calls) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Paul Kyzivat
• Re: [aqm] Review of draft-ietf-aqm-codel-07
  • From: Jana Iyengar
• Re: [aqm] Review of draft-ietf-aqm-codel-07
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: [aqm] Review of draft-ietf-aqm-codel-07
  • From: Jana Iyengar
• Review of draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted-04
  • From: Peter Yee
• RE: [aqm] Review of draft-ietf-aqm-codel-07
  • From: Gengxuesong (Geng Xuesong)
• Re: Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted-04.txt> (A SIP Response Code for Unwanted Calls) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Denis Ovsienko
• Fwd: Last Call: <draft-ietf-isis-mi-bis-01.txt> (IS-IS Multi-Instance) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Burmaa Baasansuren
• Re: Review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview-18
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted-04.txt> (A SIP Response Code for Unwanted Calls) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Dale R. Worley
• Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted-04.txt> (A SIP Response Code for Unwanted Calls) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Adam Roach
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain-15.txt> (Routing Key Chain YANG Data Model) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Acee Lindem (acee)
• Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted-04.txt> (A SIP Response Code for Unwanted Calls) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Pete Resnick
• RE: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted-04.txt> (A SIP Response Code for Unwanted Calls) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Asveren, Tolga
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted-04.txt> (A SIP Response Code for Unwanted Calls) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted-04.txt> (A SIP Response Code for Unwanted Calls) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Alan Johnston
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted-04.txt> (A SIP Response Code for Unwanted Calls) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Adam Roach
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted-04.txt> (A SIP Response Code for Unwanted Calls) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain-15.txt> (Routing Key Chain YANG Data Model) to Proposed Standard
  • From: tom p.
• IETF Journal: Latest issue now available
  • From: IETF Journal
• Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted-04.txt> (A SIP Response Code for Unwanted Calls) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ranjit Avasarala
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted-04.txt> (A SIP Response Code for Unwanted Calls) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Henning Schulzrinne
• Seeking IETF input for the future Aeronautical Telecommunications Network
  • From: Templin, Fred L
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted-04.txt> (A SIP Response Code for Unwanted Calls) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted-04.txt> (A SIP Response Code for Unwanted Calls) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
• Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted-04.txt> (A SIP Response Code for Unwanted Calls) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Adam Roach
• Review of draft-ietf-aqm-codel-07
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted-04.txt> (A SIP Response Code for Unwanted Calls) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Paul Kyzivat
• Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted-04.txt> (A SIP Response Code for Unwanted Calls) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Paul Kyzivat
• Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted-04.txt> (A SIP Response Code for Unwanted Calls) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Dale R. Worley
• final cfp: Bad Attitude PechaKucha in Chicago
  • From: Aaron Falk
• Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted-04.txt> (A SIP Response Code for Unwanted Calls) to Proposed Standard
  • From: A. Jean Mahoney
• Opening IETF 99 Registration
  • From: IETF Secretariat
• Re: Review of draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-time-format-05
  • From: Greg Mirsky
• Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-04
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: Proposed IETF Statement Concerning Personal Data for Review
  • From: Rich Kulawiec
• Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted-04.txt> (A SIP Response Code for Unwanted Calls) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Dale R. Worley
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted-04.txt> (A SIP Response Code for Unwanted Calls) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Denis Ovsienko
• Re: Operational feedback on PMTUD
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: Operational feedback on PMTUD
  • From: Suresh Krishnan
• IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07
  • From: Suresh Krishnan
• Review of draft-ietf-homenet-dot-03
  • From: Jon Mitchell
• Re: Operational feedback on PMTUD
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-04
  • From: Bob Hinden
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-04.txt> (Path MTU Discovery for IP version 6) to Internet Standard
  • From: Bob Hinden
• Review of draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-time-format-05
  • From: Jon Mitchell
• Review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview-18
  • From: Jon Mitchell
• anybody working on Socks5 RFC
  • From: Hosnieh Rafiee
• Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08
  • From: Robert Raszuk
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp-22.txt> (Using the SDP Offer/Answer Mechanism for DTLS) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Christer Holmberg
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp-22.txt> (Using the SDP Offer/Answer Mechanism for DTLS) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ben Campbell
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp-22.txt> (Using the SDP Offer/Answer Mechanism for DTLS) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Christer Holmberg
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp-22.txt> (Using the SDP Offer/Answer Mechanism for DTLS) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Russ Housley
• Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse-08
  • From: Joel Halpern
• Re: IETF 98 Final Agenda
  • From: Mark Andrews
• NomCom 2016-2017: ART AD II (Vacancy 2017)
  • From: NomCom Chair 2016
• RE: IETF 98 Final Agenda
  • From: Arleen Elliott
• Re: Review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-temporal-hitless-psm-13
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Review of draft-ietf-lmap-yang-11
  • From: Vijay Gurbani
• Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08
  • From: Leddy, John
• Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Review of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-18
  • From: Lionel Morand
• Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08
  • From: otroan
• Re: Review of draft-ietf-lmap-information-model-17
  • From: Leif Johansson
• Review of draft-ietf-dime-agent-overload-08
  • From: Shucheng LIU
• Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08
  • From: Xing Li
• Re: Do you really not care whether people accept your mail?
  • From: Brandon Long
• Re: Review of draft-ietf-lmap-information-model-17
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08
  • From: Tim Chown
• Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08
  • From: Mark Smith
• Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08
  • From: Joe Touch
• Fwd: Web Foundation responds to India consultation on net neutrality
  • From: willi uebelherr
• Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08
  • From: Voyer, Daniel
• Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08
  • From: 神明達哉
• Review of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations-09
  • From: Daniel Franke
• Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08
  • From: Leddy, John
• Re: [IoT-DIR] Review of draft-ietf-dnssd-mdns-dns-interop-04
  • From: Ines Robles
• Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08
  • From: Tim Chown
• Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Do you really not care whether people accept your mail?
  • From: Rich Kulawiec
• Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08
  • From: Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)
• Re: Review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-pki-profiles-21
  • From: Sean Turner
• Re: Do you really not care whether people accept your mail?
  • From: Nico Williams
• Review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc4307bis-17
  • From: Pete Resnick
• RE: Last call feedback: draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt
  • From: Badri.Subramanyan
• Re: Do you really not care whether people accept your mail?
  • From: Philip Homburg
• Operational feedback on PMTUD
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: Review of draft-ietf-dnssd-mdns-dns-interop-04
  • From: Tim Chown
• IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08
  • From: Suresh Krishnan
• Re: Do you really not care whether people accept your mail?
  • From: Brandon Long
• Review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases-11
  • From: Dale Worley
• RE: Last call feedback: draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt
  • From: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
• Good but not-quite-trivial change in auth-48 for draft-harkins-owe
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: yet more DMARC stuff, was Re: Mailing list membership.
  • From: Martin Rex
• Review of draft-ietf-dnssd-mdns-dns-interop-04
  • From: Ines Robles
• RE: The CIA mentions us
  • From: Tony Hain
• Re: The CIA mentions us
  • From: willi uebelherr
• Re: [Json] secdir review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03
  • From: John Cowan
• Review of draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion-07
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Review of draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-08
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-temporal-hitless-psm-13
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: Do you really not care whether people accept your mail?
  • From: Philip Homburg
• Re: Do you really not care whether people accept your mail?
  • From: Tim Chown
• Re: Do you really not care whether people accept your mail?
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: Review of draft-ietf-lmap-information-model-17
  • From: Leif Johansson
• Re: Do you really not care whether people accept your mail?
  • From: Tim Chown
• Re: Review of draft-ietf-lmap-information-model-17
  • From: Juergen Schoenwaelder
• Re: Do you really not care whether people accept your mail?
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: The CIA mentions us
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: The CIA mentions us
  • From: willi uebelherr
• Re: Do you really not care whether people accept your mail?
  • From: Christopher Morrow
• Re: Do you really not care whether people accept your mail?
  • From: Viktor Dukhovni
• Re: Do you really not care whether people accept your mail?
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Do you really not care whether people accept your mail?
  • From: Jared Mauch
• Re: The CIA mentions us
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Do you really not care whether people accept your mail?
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: yet more DMARC stuff, was Re: Mailing list membership.
  • From: Philip Homburg
• Re: yet more DMARC stuff, was Re: Mailing list membership.
  • From: Brandon Long
• Re: yet more DMARC stuff, was Re: Mailing list membership.
  • From: Philip Homburg
• Re: [Json] secdir review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: [Json] secdir review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: yet more DMARC stuff, was Re: Mailing list membership.
  • From: Viktor Dukhovni
• Re: yet more DMARC stuff, was Re: Mailing list membership.
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: [Json] secdir review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: yet more DMARC stuff, was Re: Mailing list membership.
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: [secdir] [Json] secdir review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03
  • From: Nico Williams
• Review of draft-ietf-ippm-model-based-metrics-10
  • From: Robert Sparks
• Re: [Json] secdir review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03
  • From: Matthew A. Miller
• Re: yet more DMARC stuff, was Re: Mailing list membership.
  • From: John R Levine
• Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-11
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: yet more DMARC stuff, was Re: Mailing list membership.
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: yet more DMARC stuff, was Re: Mailing list membership.
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: yet more DMARC stuff, was Re: Mailing list membership.
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: [Json] secdir review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03
  • From: Peter Cordell
• Re: [Json] secdir review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03
  • From: Stefan Hagen
• Re: [Json] secdir review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: The CIA mentions us
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: [Json] secdir review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: [Json] secdir review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: [Json] secdir review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03
  • From: Elwyn Davies
• Re: [Spasm] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-05.txt> (Internationalized Email Addresses in X.509 certificates) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Wei Chuang
• Re: [Json] secdir review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: The CIA mentions us
  • From: Rich Kulawiec
• Re: [Json] secdir review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: [Json] secdir review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: [Json] secdir review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: [Json] secdir review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03
  • From: Peter Cordell
• Review of draft-ietf-dime-load-08
  • From: Roni Even
• Re: [Json] secdir review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03
  • From: John Cowan
• Re: [Json] secdir review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: Review of draft-ietf-trill-rfc6439bis-04
  • From: Dan Romascanu
• Re: [Json] secdir review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: Review of draft-ietf-trill-rfc6439bis-04
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Re: The CIA mentions us
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Re: The CIA mentions us
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [Json] secdir review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03
  • From: John Cowan
• Re: The CIA mentions us
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: The CIA mentions us
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: The CIA mentions us
  • From: Bob Hinden
• Re: The CIA mentions us
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: The CIA mentions us
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: The CIA mentions us
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: The CIA mentions us
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Review of draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-time-format-04
  • From: Joel Halpern
• Re: The CIA mentions us
  • From: Michael Richardson
• RE: Last call feedback: draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt
  • From: Badri.Subramanyan
• Re: The CIA mentions us
  • From: willi uebelherr
• Re: Review of draft-leiba-rfc2119-update-02
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Conclusion of the facilitators experiment
  • From: IETF Chair
• Review of draft-leiba-rfc2119-update-02
  • From: Robert Sparks
• Re: The CIA mentions us
  • From: Vinayak Hegde
• Re: The CIA mentions us
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: The CIA mentions us
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: The CIA mentions us
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: [Spasm] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-05.txt> (Internationalized Email Addresses in X.509 certificates) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Wei Chuang
• Re: The CIA mentions us
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: The CIA mentions us
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• RE: Last call feedback: draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt
  • From: Badri.Subramanyan
• Re: [Spasm] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-05.txt> (Internationalized Email Addresses in X.509 certificates) to Proposed Standard
  • From: tom p.
• Final version of draft-bradner-rfc3979bis
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: [Json] secdir review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03
  • From: Benjamin Kaduk
• Re: [Spasm] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-05.txt> (Internationalized Email Addresses in X.509 certificates) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Viktor Dukhovni
• RE: [I2nsf] Last Call: <draft-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases-11.txt> (I2NSF Problem Statement and Use cases) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Susan Hares
• Re: [Spasm] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-05.txt> (Internationalized Email Addresses in X.509 certificates) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Wei Chuang
• Re: [Spasm] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-05.txt> (Internationalized Email Addresses in X.509 certificates) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Viktor Dukhovni
• Re: [Spasm] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-05.txt> (Internationalized Email Addresses in X.509 certificates) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Wei Chuang
• IETF hackathon - Register and Add your Projects NOW!
  • From: Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
• Re: [Json] Last Call: <draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03.txt> (The JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Data Interchange Format) to Internet Standard
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: IETF Hackathon98 - remote presentation
  • From: Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
• Re: IETF Hackathon98 - remote presentation
  • From: Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03.txt> (The JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Data Interchange Format) to Internet Standard
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03.txt> (The JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Data Interchange Format) to Internet Standard
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03.txt> (The JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Data Interchange Format) to Internet Standard
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03.txt> (The JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Data Interchange Format) to Internet Standard
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-05.txt> (Internationalized Email Addresses in X.509 certificates) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Review of draft-ietf-dane-smime-15
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• IETF Hackathon98 - remote presentation
  • From: lavanyahm
• Re: [Json] secdir review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: [Json] secdir review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03
  • From: Julian Reschke
• RE: Review of draft-ietf-dime-load-07
  • From: Roni Even
• Review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-temporal-hitless-psm-12
  • From: Jon Mitchell
• Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03
  • From: Benjamin Kaduk
• Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: Interest in a push-based two-factor auth standard?
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• secdir review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03
  • From: Benjamin Kaduk
• Re: Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-04
  • From: Suresh Krishnan
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-05.txt> (Internationalized Email Addresses in X.509 certificates) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Viktor Dukhovni
• Re: Last Call: <draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion-05.txt> (Design considerations for Metadata Insertion) to Informational RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Interest in a push-based two-factor auth standard?
  • From: Alex Jordan
• Re: RANT: posting IDs more often -- more is better -- why are we so shy?
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: More haste, less speed.
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-05.txt> (Internationalized Email Addresses in X.509 certificates) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Russ Housley
• Re: The CIA mentions us
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: The CIA mentions us
  • From: David Morris
• Re: The CIA mentions us
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: Adding IPv10 to the IETF 98 Agenda.
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: [Slim] Review of draft-ietf-slim-negotiating-human-language-08
  • From: Randall Gellens
• Re: The CIA mentions us
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Re: The CIA mentions us
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: The CIA mentions us
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Adding IPv10 to the IETF 98 Agenda.
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: The CIA mentions us
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Adding IPv10 to the IETF 98 Agenda.
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• The CIA mentions us
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: Review of draft-ietf-dime-load-07
  • From: Steve Donovan
• Re: Adding IPv10 to the IETF 98 Agenda.
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: [RTG-DIR] [spring] Review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-03
  • From: Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)
• Re: Adding IPv10 to the IETF 98 Agenda.
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• RE: [RTG-DIR] [spring] Review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-03
  • From: Susan Hares
• Re: Last Call: <draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion-05.txt> (Design considerations for Metadata Insertion) to Informational RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• RE: Last Call: <draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion-05.txt> (Design considerations for Metadata Insertion) to Informational RFC
  • From: mohamed.boucadair
• Re: Last Call: <draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion-05.txt> (Design considerations for Metadata Insertion) to Informational RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: [spring] Review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-03
  • From: Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)
• Re: [Slim] Review of draft-ietf-slim-negotiating-human-language-08
  • From: Gunnar Hellström
• Re: Adding IPv10 to the IETF 98 Agenda.
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• RE: Last Call: <draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion-05.txt> (Design considerations for Metadata Insertion) to Informational RFC
  • From: mohamed.boucadair
• Re: RANT: posting IDs more often -- more is better -- why are we so shy?
  • From: Eric Rescorla
• Re: RANT: posting IDs more often -- more is better -- why are we so shy?
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: RANT: posting IDs more often -- more is better -- why are we so shy?
  • From: Eric Rescorla
• Re: RANT: posting IDs more often -- more is better -- why are we so shy?
  • From: Eric Rescorla
• RE: Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-04
  • From: Susan Hares
• Re: RANT: posting IDs more often -- more is better -- why are we so shy?
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Review of draft-ietf-slim-negotiating-human-language-08
  • From: Mahesh Jethanandani
• Re: Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-04
  • From: Bob Hinden
• Re: More haste, less speed.
  • From: Viktor Dukhovni
• Re: More haste, less speed.
  • From: Gary E. Miller
• Re: More haste, less speed.
  • From: Viktor Dukhovni
• Re: More haste, less speed.
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: More haste, less speed.
  • From: Viktor Dukhovni
• Re: Last Call: <draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion-05.txt> (Design considerations for Metadata Insertion) to Informational RFC
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: Adding IPv10 to the IETF 98 Agenda.
  • From: Khaled Omar
• Re: [spring] Review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-03
  • From: Robert Raszuk
• Re: Adding IPv10 to the IETF 98 Agenda.
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Review of draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-rfc6810-bis-08
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Review of draft-harkins-owe-05
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Review of draft-ietf-lisp-type-iana-04
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Adding IPv10 to the IETF 98 Agenda.
  • From: Khaled Omar
• Review of draft-ietf-curdle-cms-chacha20-poly1305-04
  • From: Matthew Miller
• More haste, less speed.
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-03
  • From: Susan Hares
• Re: Remote Mentors Needed for Sri Lanka, Pakistan and Bangladesh
  • From: nalini.elkins
• Re: Interest in a push-based two-factor auth standard?
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• RE: Last Call: <draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion-05.txt> (Design considerations for Metadata Insertion) to Informational RFC
  • From: mohamed.boucadair
• Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-10
  • From: Roni Even
• Re: Remote Mentors Needed for Sri Lanka, Pakistan and Bangladesh
  • From: Sankalp Bagaria
• Remote Mentors Needed for Sri Lanka, Pakistan and Bangladesh
  • From: nalini.elkins
• Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-04
  • From: Susan Hares
• Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-time-format-04.txt
  • From: Greg Mirsky
• RE: Review of draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange-10
  • From: Black, David
• Re: Last Call: <draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion-05.txt> (Design considerations for Metadata Insertion) to Informational RFC
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: Review of draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-time-format-03
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: Review of draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-time-format-03
  • From: Greg Mirsky
• Re: Interest in a push-based two-factor auth standard?
  • From: Alex Jordan
• Review of draft-ietf-dprive-dtls-and-tls-profiles-08
  • From: Colin Perkins
• Review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03
  • From: Elwyn Davies
• Re: RANT: posting IDs more often -- more is better -- why are we so shy?
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: RANT: posting IDs more often -- more is better -- why are we so shy?
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: RANT: posting IDs more often -- more is better -- why are we so shy?
  • From: tom p.
• Review of draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-06
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Review of draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion-06
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• RE: Last Call: <draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion-05.txt> (Design considerations for Metadata Insertion) to Informational RFC
  • From: mohamed.boucadair
• Conclusion of last calls for RFC2460bis, RFC4291bis, and RFC1981bis
  • From: Suresh Krishnan
• Review of draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-time-format-03
  • From: Joel Halpern
• Remote hubs for IETF 98: Zurich
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: yet more DMARC stuff, was Re: Mailing list membership.
  • From: willi uebelherr
• Re: RANT: posting IDs more often -- more is better -- why are we so shy?
  • From: Warren Kumari
• Re: [Mailman-Users] Fwd: Re: Mailing list membership.
  • From: willi uebelherr
• Re: Last Call: <draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion-05.txt> (Design considerations for Metadata Insertion) to Informational RFC
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: Interest in a push-based two-factor auth standard?
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: RANT: posting IDs more often -- more is better -- why are we so shy?
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: RANT: posting IDs more often -- more is better -- why are we so shy?
  • From: Michael Richardson
• RE: Last Call: <draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion-05.txt> (Design considerations for Metadata Insertion) to Informational RFC
  • From: mohamed.boucadair
• Review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-pki-profiles-21
  • From: Shucheng LIU
• Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-14
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03
  • From: Jürgen Schönwälder
• Review of draft-ietf-dime-load-07
  • From: Shucheng LIU
• Interest in a push-based two-factor auth standard?
  • From: Alex Jordan
• Re: [Mailman-Users] Fwd: Re: Mailing list membership.
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: RANT: posting IDs more often -- more is better -- why are we so shy?
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: RANT: posting IDs more often -- more is better -- why are we so shy?
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: [Mailman-Users] Fwd: Re: Mailing list membership.
  • From: willi uebelherr
• Re: Mailing list membership.
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: Mailing list membership.
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: Mailing list membership.
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: Mailing list membership.
  • From: willi uebelherr
• Re: RANT: posting IDs more often -- more is better -- why are we so shy?
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: RANT: posting IDs more often -- more is better -- why are we so shy?
  • From: Patrick McManus
• yet more DMARC stuff, was Re: Mailing list membership.
  • From: John Levine
• Re: RANT: posting IDs more often -- more is better -- why are we so shy?
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: RANT: posting IDs more often -- more is better -- why are we so shy?
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: Mailing list membership.
  • From: David Morris
• Re: Mailing list membership.
  • From: willi uebelherr
• Re: RANT: posting IDs more often -- more is better -- why are we so shy?
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Mailing list membership.
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: Mailing list membership.
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: Mailing list membership.
  • From: Bob Hinden
• Re: Mailing list membership.
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: Mailing list membership.
  • From: Kazunori ANDO
• Re: RANT: posting IDs more often -- more is better -- why are we so shy?
  • From: Patrick McManus
• Re: RANT: posting IDs more often -- more is better -- why are we so shy?
  • From: Kathleen Moriarty
• RANT: posting IDs more often -- more is better -- why are we so shy?
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: IETF 98 Preliminary Agenda
  • From: Laurent Ciavaglia
• RE: IETF 98 Preliminary Agenda
  • From: Mehmet Ersue
• RE: IETF 98 Preliminary Agenda
  • From: Mehmet Ersue
• Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08
  • From: Peter Yee
• Re: Mailing list membership.
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-dane-smime-15
  • From: Dale R. Worley
• Re: Mailing list membership.
  • From: willi uebelherr
• Re: [6lo] Last Call: <draft-ietf-6lo-6lobac-06.txt> (Transmission of IPv6 over MS/TP Networks) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Dale R. Worley
• Re: Review of draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange-10
  • From: Shitanshu Shah
• Review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-temporal-hitless-psm-12
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-05.txt> (Internationalized Email Addresses in X.509 certificates) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Viktor Dukhovni
• Re: Proposed IETF Statement Concerning Personal Data for Review
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-05.txt> (Internationalized Email Addresses in X.509 certificates) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Wei Chuang
• Re: Proposed IETF Statement Concerning Personal Data for Review
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Proposed IETF Statement Concerning Personal Data for Review
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Mailing list membership.
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• Re: [6lo] Last Call: <draft-ietf-6lo-6lobac-06.txt> (Transmission of IPv6 over MS/TP Networks) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Kerry Lynn
• REMINDER: Agenda and connection details for the IASA 2.0 workshops
  • From: IETF Chair
• cfp: Bad Attitude PechaKucha in Chicago
  • From: Aaron Falk
• Re: Mailing list membership.
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Mailing list membership.
  • From: willi uebelherr
• Review of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-14
  • From: Robert Sparks
• Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-dane-smime-15
  • From: Dale R. Worley
• Re: Review of draft-ietf-anima-grasp-09
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: Proposed IETF Statement Concerning Personal Data for Review
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Proposed IETF Statement Concerning Personal Data for Review
  • From: Johnny Wang
• Re: Proposed IETF Statement Concerning Personal Data for Review
  • From: Rich Kulawiec
• Re: Proposed IETF Statement Concerning Personal Data for Review
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• Re: Proposed IETF Statement Concerning Personal Data for Review
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: Proposed IETF Statement Concerning Personal Data for Review
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• RE: Review of draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange-10
  • From: Black, David
• Proposed IETF Statement Concerning Personal Data for Review
  • From: IETF Administrative Director
• Re: Mailing list membership.
  • From: willi uebelherr
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08.txt> (Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) Specification) to Internet Standard
  • From: Alexandre Petrescu
• Re: IETF 98 Preliminary Agenda
  • From: Eggert, Lars
• Re: Mailing list membership.
  • From: willi uebelherr
• Re: Mailing list membership.
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08.txt> (Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) Specification) to Internet Standard
  • From: Erik Kline
• Re: Mailing list membership.
  • From: willi uebelherr
• Review of draft-ietf-lmap-information-model-17
  • From: Russ Housley
• Re: Mailing list membership.
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Address types [was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08.txt> (Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) Specification) to Internet Standard]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Mailing list membership.
  • From: Khaled Omar
• Review of draft-ietf-dane-smime-15
  • From: Dale Worley
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08.txt> (Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) Specification) to Internet Standard
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08.txt> (Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) Specification) to Internet Standard
  • From: Sander Steffann
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08.txt> (Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) Specification) to Internet Standard
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08.txt> (Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) Specification) to Internet Standard
  • From: Sander Steffann
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08.txt> (Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) Specification) to Internet Standard
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Review of draft-ietf-pce-inter-layer-ext-12
  • From: Roni Even
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08.txt> (Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) Specification) to Internet Standard
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: IETF 98 Preliminary Agenda
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: IETF 98 Preliminary Agenda
  • From: Christian Hopps
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Xing Li
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Xing Li
• Impact of the "CloudBleed" bug on www.ietf.org
  • From: IETF Chair
• Review of draft-ietf-anima-grasp-09
  • From: Joel Halpern
• Re: IETF 98 Preliminary Agenda
  • From: joel jaeggli
• RE: IETF 98 Preliminary Agenda
  • From: Mehmet Ersue
• Re: Last Call: <draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion-05.txt> (Design considerations for Metadata Insertion) to Informational RFC
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: 神明達哉
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis prohibiting non-/64 subnets
  • From: Philip Homburg
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis prohibiting non-/64 subnets
  • From: Gert Doering
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis prohibiting non-/64 subnets
  • From: Alexandre PETRESCU
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis prohibiting non-/64 subnets
  • From: Alexandre Petrescu
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis prohibiting non-/64 subnets
  • From: Christopher Morrow
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis prohibiting non-/64 subnets
  • From: Alexandre Petrescu
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: David Farmer
• Re: Review of draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange-10
  • From: Shitanshu Shah
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis prohibiting non-/64 subnets
  • From: Christopher Morrow
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis prohibiting non-/64 subnets
  • From: Alexandre Petrescu
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis prohibiting non-/64 subnets
  • From: Christopher Morrow
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis prohibiting non-/64 subnets
  • From: heasley
• Re: [Slim] IETF last call for draft-ietf-slim-negotiating-human-language (Issue 8, section 6, IANA registrations)
  • From: Randall Gellens
• RE: Review of draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange-10
  • From: Black, David
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis prohibiting non-/64 subnets
  • From: Alexandre Petrescu
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Alexandre Petrescu
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Nick Hilliard
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Alexandre Petrescu
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis prohibiting non-/64 subnets
  • From: Christopher Morrow
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis prohibiting non-/64 subnets
  • From: Christopher Morrow
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Alexandre Petrescu
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc2141bis-urn-20.txt> (Uniform Resource Names (URNs)) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Peter Saint-Andre - Filament
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis prohibiting non-/64 subnets
  • From: Alexandre Petrescu
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Alexandre Petrescu
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Mikael Abrahamsson
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis prohibiting non-/64 subnets
  • From: Mikael Abrahamsson
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc2141bis-urn-20.txt> (Uniform Resource Names (URNs)) to Proposed Standard
  • From: tom p.
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: tom p.
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Philip Homburg
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis prohibiting non-/64 subnets
  • From: Sander Steffann
• Re: Last Call Summary on <draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-10.txt> (Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis prohibiting non-/64 subnets
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis prohibiting non-/64 subnets
  • From: Gert Doering
• Re: Review of draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange-10
  • From: Shitanshu Shah
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis prohibiting non-/64 subnets
  • From: Erik Kline
• RE: Last Call: <draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion-05.txt> (Design considerations for Metadata Insertion) to Informational RFC
  • From: mohamed.boucadair
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: David Farmer
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis prohibiting non-/64 subnets
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: [Slim] IETF last call for draft-ietf-slim-negotiating-human-language (Issue 8, section 6, IANA registrations)
  • From: Gunnar Hellström
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis prohibiting non-/64 subnets
  • From: Gert Doering
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis prohibiting non-/64 subnets
  • From: Gert Doering
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Pierre Pfister
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: David Farmer
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis prohibiting non-/64 subnets
  • From: Pierre Pfister
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis prohibiting non-/64 subnets
  • From: Christopher Morrow
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis prohibiting non-/64 subnets
  • From: Jared Mauch
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis prohibiting non-/64 subnets
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis prohibiting non-/64 subnets
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis prohibiting non-/64 subnets
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis prohibiting non-/64 subnets
  • From: Christopher Morrow
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis prohibiting non-/64 subnets
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Jared Mauch
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis prohibiting non-/64 subnets
  • From: Xing Li
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Jared Mauch
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis prohibiting non-/64 subnets
  • From: Mark Smith
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Ralph Droms
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5666bis-10
  • From: Ralph Droms
• Re: Last Call: <draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion-05.txt> (Design considerations for Metadata Insertion) to Informational RFC
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Christopher Morrow
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis prohibiting non-/64 subnets
  • From: Pierre Pfister
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: David Farmer
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis prohibiting non-/64 subnets
  • From: Nick Hilliard
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis prohibiting non-/64 subnets
  • From: Gert Doering
• RE: [Spasm] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-05.txt> (Internationalized Email Addresses in X.509 certificates) to Proposed Standard
  • From: John C Klensin
• RE: [Spasm] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-05.txt> (Internationalized Email Addresses in X.509 certificates) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Jim Schaad
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis prohibiting non-/64 subnets
  • From: Mark Smith
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-05.txt> (Internationalized Email Addresses in X.509 certificates) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Last Call: <draft-bchv-rfc6890bis-04.txt> (Special-Purpose IP Address Registries) to Best Current Practice
  • From: David Farmer
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis prohibiting non-/64 subnets
  • From: Job Snijders
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis prohibiting non-/64 subnets
  • From: Gert Doering
• draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis prohibiting non-/64 subnets
  • From: Nick Hilliard
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: 神明達哉
• Re: Last Call: <draft-bchv-rfc6890bis-04.txt> (Special-Purpose IP Address Registries) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Russ Housley
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Christopher Morrow
• Re: [Slim] Review of draft-ietf-slim-negotiating-human-language-06
  • From: Randall Gellens
• Re: Objection to draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: Objection to draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt
  • From: Job Snijders
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: [Tsv-art] Review of draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion-05
  • From: Michael Tuexen
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Peter Hessler
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Job Snijders
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Alexandre Petrescu
• Re: Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc5987bis-04
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc5987bis-04
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Wilco Baan Hofman
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Job Snijders
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: tom p.
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Pierre Pfister
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Philip Homburg
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc2141bis-urn-20.txt> (Uniform Resource Names (URNs)) to Proposed Standard
  • From: tom p.
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Alexandre Petrescu
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Alexandre Petrescu
• Review of draft-ietf-dime-load-07
  • From: Roni Even
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Alexandre Petrescu
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: sthaug
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Alexandre Petrescu
• Re: Follow up on barriers to entry blog post
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: sthaug
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Erik Kline
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Fernando Gont
• RE: Last Call: <draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion-05.txt> (Design considerations for Metadata Insertion) to Informational RFC
  • From: mohamed.boucadair
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Erik Kline
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Manfredi, Albert E
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08.txt> (Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) Specification) to Internet Standard
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: Last Call: <draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion-05.txt> (Design considerations for Metadata Insertion) to Informational RFC
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: Review of draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion-05
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: Review of draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion-05
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Last Call Summary on <draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-10.txt> (Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: [Slim] Review of draft-ietf-slim-negotiating-human-language-06
  • From: Randall Gellens
• Re: [Slim] Review of draft-ietf-slim-negotiating-human-language-06
  • From: Randall Gellens
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Looking for more Discussion on IETF Hubs: draft-atlas-community-hubs-00.txt
  • From: Alia Atlas
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Manfredi, Albert E
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: David Farmer
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: David Farmer
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Alexandre Petrescu
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Alexandre Petrescu
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Mark Smith
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Agenda and connection details for the IASA 2.0 workshops
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Job Snijders
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Alexandre Petrescu
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: David Farmer
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Job Snijders
• Re: Review of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-13
  • From: Greg Mirsky
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• RE: [Idr] Review of draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange-10
  • From: Susan Hares
• Re: [Slim] Review of draft-ietf-slim-negotiating-human-language-06
  • From: Gunnar Hellström
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Job Snijders
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Alexandre Petrescu
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Alexandre Petrescu
• Re: Review of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-13
  • From: Robert Sparks
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Christopher Morrow
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Christopher Morrow
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Job Snijders
• Re: Review of draft-ietf-slim-negotiating-human-language-06
  • From: Randall Gellens
• Re: Review of draft-ietf-slim-negotiating-human-language-06
  • From: Randall Gellens
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: David Farmer
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: Review of draft-ietf-slim-negotiating-human-language-06
  • From: Natasha Rooney
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Job Snijders
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Christopher Morrow
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
  • From: Brian E Carpenter