+1 None of the questions asked are in invasive, while helping us to better understand remote participation dynamics. I also think adding few questions about "why remote" would help us in the future to make better choices when it comes to organization. Regards, Jeff > On May 9, 2017, at 14:22, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > +1 for better data collection. We do need it. > > As for other future charging developments brought up by Stephen, those are perhaps a point to be discussed in the later. For sure the potential for changing the model should be acknowledged. But, I have no reason to doubt that IETF’s community’s wishes wouldn’t be driving whatever direction remote participation may develop into. > > Jari >