Re: Registration for remote participation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



+1 for better data collection. We do need it.

As for other future charging developments brought up by Stephen, those are perhaps a point to be discussed in the later. For sure the potential for changing the model should be acknowledged. But, I have no reason to doubt that IETF’s community’s wishes wouldn’t be driving whatever direction remote participation may develop into.

Jari

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]