Thanks! > Am 09.05.2017 um 00:39 schrieb Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@xxxxxxxxx>: > > Yes, I believe that the changes made were sufficient. > > On 8 May 2017 at 22:15, Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF) <ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi Martin, >> >> just to double check: do you think this document is ready now and all your comments have been addressed? >> >> Mirja >> >> >>> Am 27.04.2017 um 13:57 schrieb Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Nozay) <sabine.randriamasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >>> >>> Hello Martin, >>> >>> I just posted an update where the " Requirements Language" text has been moved in a section 1.1. >>> As I saw it on a number of other ietf drafts, I also added the sentence >>> "When the words appear in lower case, their natural language meaning is used." >>> >>> The update and status are available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-multi-cost/ >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Sabine >>> >>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Martin Thomson [mailto:martin.thomson@xxxxxxxxx] >>>>> Sent: 26 April 2017 08:39 >>>>> To: Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Nozay) <sabine.randriamasy@nokia- >>>>> bell-labs.com> >>>>> Cc: art@xxxxxxxx; alto@xxxxxxxx; ietf@xxxxxxxx; draft-ietf-alto-multi- >>>>> cost.all@xxxxxxxx >>>>> Subject: Re: Artart telechat review of draft-ietf-alto-multi-cost-08 >>>>> >>>>> On 26 April 2017 at 03:26, Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Nozay) >>>>> <sabine.randriamasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>>>> This document doesn't cite RFC 2119, but it uses the keywords. >>>>>> [SR ] RFC 2119 is cited on page 1, section " Requirements Language" and >>>>> section "9.1. Normative References". Should it be referenced elsewhere? >>>>> >>>>> The convention is to put those in the body, I missed it in the boilerplate. >>>>> >>>>> I skimmed the other changes, and they look fine. >> > > _______________________________________________ > alto mailing list > alto@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto