Hi Martin, just to double check: do you think this document is ready now and all your comments have been addressed? Mirja > Am 27.04.2017 um 13:57 schrieb Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Nozay) <sabine.randriamasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > Hello Martin, > > I just posted an update where the " Requirements Language" text has been moved in a section 1.1. > As I saw it on a number of other ietf drafts, I also added the sentence > "When the words appear in lower case, their natural language meaning is used." > > The update and status are available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-multi-cost/ > > Thanks, > Sabine > > >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Martin Thomson [mailto:martin.thomson@xxxxxxxxx] >>> Sent: 26 April 2017 08:39 >>> To: Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Nozay) <sabine.randriamasy@nokia- >>> bell-labs.com> >>> Cc: art@xxxxxxxx; alto@xxxxxxxx; ietf@xxxxxxxx; draft-ietf-alto-multi- >>> cost.all@xxxxxxxx >>> Subject: Re: Artart telechat review of draft-ietf-alto-multi-cost-08 >>> >>> On 26 April 2017 at 03:26, Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Nozay) >>> <sabine.randriamasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>> This document doesn't cite RFC 2119, but it uses the keywords. >>>> [SR ] RFC 2119 is cited on page 1, section " Requirements Language" and >>> section "9.1. Normative References". Should it be referenced elsewhere? >>> >>> The convention is to put those in the body, I missed it in the boilerplate. >>> >>> I skimmed the other changes, and they look fine.