Re: Artart telechat review of draft-ietf-alto-multi-cost-08

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 26 April 2017 at 03:26, Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Nozay)
<sabine.randriamasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>This document doesn't cite RFC 2119, but it uses the keywords.
> [SR     ] RFC 2119 is cited on page 1, section " Requirements Language" and section "9.1.  Normative References". Should it be referenced elsewhere?

The convention is to put those in the body, I missed it in the boilerplate.

I skimmed the other changes, and they look fine.




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]