RE: Artart telechat review of draft-ietf-alto-multi-cost-08

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Martin,

Thanks, I'll update with RFC 2119 cited at appropriate places 
Sabine


>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Martin Thomson [mailto:martin.thomson@xxxxxxxxx]
>>Sent: 26 April 2017 08:39
>>To: Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Nozay) <sabine.randriamasy@nokia-
>>bell-labs.com>
>>Cc: art@xxxxxxxx; alto@xxxxxxxx; ietf@xxxxxxxx; draft-ietf-alto-multi-
>>cost.all@xxxxxxxx
>>Subject: Re: Artart telechat review of draft-ietf-alto-multi-cost-08
>>
>>On 26 April 2017 at 03:26, Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Nozay)
>><sabine.randriamasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>This document doesn't cite RFC 2119, but it uses the keywords.
>>> [SR     ] RFC 2119 is cited on page 1, section " Requirements Language" and
>>section "9.1.  Normative References". Should it be referenced elsewhere?
>>
>>The convention is to put those in the body, I missed it in the boilerplate.
>>
>>I skimmed the other changes, and they look fine.




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]