Hello Martin, I just posted an update where the " Requirements Language" text has been moved in a section 1.1. As I saw it on a number of other ietf drafts, I also added the sentence "When the words appear in lower case, their natural language meaning is used." The update and status are available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-multi-cost/ Thanks, Sabine >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Martin Thomson [mailto:martin.thomson@xxxxxxxxx] >>Sent: 26 April 2017 08:39 >>To: Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Nozay) <sabine.randriamasy@nokia- >>bell-labs.com> >>Cc: art@xxxxxxxx; alto@xxxxxxxx; ietf@xxxxxxxx; draft-ietf-alto-multi- >>cost.all@xxxxxxxx >>Subject: Re: Artart telechat review of draft-ietf-alto-multi-cost-08 >> >>On 26 April 2017 at 03:26, Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Nozay) >><sabine.randriamasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>This document doesn't cite RFC 2119, but it uses the keywords. >>> [SR ] RFC 2119 is cited on page 1, section " Requirements Language" and >>section "9.1. Normative References". Should it be referenced elsewhere? >> >>The convention is to put those in the body, I missed it in the boilerplate. >> >>I skimmed the other changes, and they look fine.