Re: [manet] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-multipath-12

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dear Peter, 

Thanks very much for the detailed comments. 
We have updated the draft and will make a new submission soon. 

cheers

Jiazi

> On 5 May 2017, at 05:34, Peter Yee <peter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Peter Yee
> Review result: Ready with Nits
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-multipath-12
> Reviewer: Peter Yee
> Review Date: 2017-05-04
> IETF LC End Date: 2017-05-04
> IESG Telechat date: 2017-05-11
> 
> Summary: This Experimental draft is ready with nits.  The draft
> specifies an interoperable, multipath extension to OLSRv2.  Other than
> the nits, I find the draft to be a fine experiment to help determine
> how well OLSRv2 can be improved by allowing multiple, disjoint paths
> between nodes.
> 
> Major issues: None
> 
> Minor issues: None
> 
> Nits/editorial comments: 
> 
> General:
> 
> I'd suggesting changing occurrences of "multi-path" to "multipath" for
> consistency with prior works, including the primary work by the same
> authors [ADHOC11].
> 
> Consider changing "Multi-path Dijkstra Algorithm" to "multipath
> Dijkstra's algorithm".  In any case, use the name consistently - it
> varies throughout the document.
> 
> Change "Round-Robin" (and variations in capitalization) to
> "round-robin" throughout the document.
> 
> Stick to one capitalization form for "MP-OLSRv2 Routing Process".
> 
> Section 10 was not reviewed because it contains RFC Editor
> instructions to delete it.
> 
> Specific:
> 
> Page 3, section 1, 2nd paragraph, last sentence: append a comma after
> "reliability".
> 
> Page 3, section 1, 3rd paragraph, 1st sentence: delete the leading
> "The".  Insert "the "before "Multi-path Dijkstra".  [See general
> comment about hyphenating multi-path].
> 
> Page, section 1.1, 4th bullet item: delete the second "the".
> 
> Page 4, 1st full paragraph, 2nd sentence: change "Standard" to
> "Standards".  Delete comma after "Track".
> 
> Page 4, 2nd bullet item, 3rd sentence: change "setting" to "applying".
> (This is an aesthetics comment - take it or leave it.)
> 
> Page 4, 4th bullet item, 3rd sentence: expand acronym "MPR" on first
> usage and in general do so for all acronyms that would not be
> immediately obvious to a large audience.
> 
> Page 4, 5th bullet item, 4th sentence: delete "the" before "loose".
> 
> Page 4, 6th bullet, 3rd sentence: append "parts" after "following".
> 
> Page 6, section 3, 1st paragraph, 2nd sentence: delete both commas.
> 
> Page 6, section 3, 2nd paragraph, 2nd sentence: delete "the" before
> "information".  Insert "a" before "DiffServ".  Change "Code Point" to
> codepoint.  [RFC 2474 only refers to these a "Code Point" in specific
> names, but otherwise uses the generic form "codepoint".
> 
> Page 6, section 3, 3rd paragraph, 1st sentence: insert "a" before
> "new".
> 
> Page 6, section 3, 3rd paragraph, 3rd sentence: insert "the" before
> "loose".
> 
> Page 7, section 4, 3rd bullet item: insert "the" before "shortest".
> 
> Page 8, partial paragraph at top: change "as" to "using the".
> 
> Page 8, section 5.1, SR_TC_INTERVAL definition: change "a" to "an".
> 
> Page 8, section 5.1, SR_HOLD_TIME_MULTIPLIER definition:  change
> "minimal" to "minimum".  Change "a" to "an" unless that acronym is
> spoken like a word and not spelled out.
> 
> Page 8, section 6, 2nd sentence: delete comma after "datagram".
> 
> Page 9, section 6.1, 1st sentence: insert "the" before "MP-OLSRv2".  
> 
> Page 9, section 6.1.1, 1st paragraph, 1st sentence: change
> "signalling" to "signaling".  [Other words in the document tend to
> suggest that the American spellings are being used rather than British
> forms.]
> 
> Page 9, section 6.2.1, 1st sentence: insert "the" before "loose".
> 
> Page 10, section 7.1, 1st paragraph, 2nd sentence: delete the comma. 
> Insert "the" before each of "MP-OLSRv2" and "OLSRv2".
> 
> Page 11, section 8, 2nd sentence: insert "the" before "topology".
> 
> Page 11, section 8, 3rd sentence: change "between" to "from the".
> 
> Page 11, section 8.1, 2nd paragraph, 2nd sentence: insert "the" before
> "SR_TC_INTERVAL".
> 
> Page 11, section 8.1, 2nd paragraph, 3rd sentence: delete "The".
> 
> Page 11, section 8.1, 2nd paragraph, 5th sentence: insert "the" before
> "SOURCE_ROUTE TLV".
> 
> Page 12, section 8.3, 1st bullet item: change "possiblity" to
> "possibility".
> 
> Page 12, section 8.3, 2nd bullet item, 2nd sentence: perhaps change
> "Or else" to "Otherwise".
> 
> Page 12, section 8.4, 1st paragraph: insert "a" before "DiffServ". 
> Change "Code Point" to "codepoint".
> 
> Page 13, 1st paragraph, last sentence: insert "the" before "OLSRv2".
> 
> Page 13, 3rd paragraph, 2nd sentence: insert "the" before "format".
> 
> Page 13, the paragraph: insert "the" before "following".
> 
> Page 13, last paragraph, 2nd sentence: insert "the" before "outer" and
> "source".
> 
> Page 14, section 8.5.1, 1st paragraph after the 1st set of bullet
> items: insert "the" before "SR-OLSRv2".
> 
> Page 14, section 8.5.1, 2nd paragraph after the 1st set of bullet
> items, 3rd sentence: insert "the" before "OLSRv2".
> 
> Page 14, section 8.5.1, 2nd paragraph after the 1st set of bullet
> items, 4th sentence: change "much" to "many".
> 
> Page 14, section 8.5.1, 3rd paragraph after the 1st set of bullet
> items: shouldn't this be up to "NUMBER_OF_PATHS" rather than always
> "NUMBER_OF_PATHS" paths that are created?  Meaning that it's possible
> the algorithm will not have sufficient disjoint paths to choose from
> in some (probably degenerate) cases?  Delete the second comma in the
> sentence.
> 
> Page 14, section 8.5.1, 2nd set of bullet items, 2nd bullet item, 1st
> sentence: change "A" to "An".
> 
> Page 14, section 8.5.1, 2nd set of bullet items, 2nd bullet item, 2nd
> sentence: insert "the" before "Multi-path".
> 
> Page 14, section 8.5.2, 1st sentence: insert "the" before
> "Multi-path".
> 
> Page 15, 1st full paragraph, 1st sentence: change the second
> occurrence of "Dijkstra" to "Dijkstra's".
> 
> Page 15, 2nd bullet item, 2nd sentence: change "is" to "does".
> 
> Page 15, 1st paragraph after bullet items, 3rd sentence: change
> "vetex" to "vertex".
> 
> Page 15, 1st paragraph after figure, 2nd sentence: change "of" to
> "for".
> 
> Page 16, 1st sentence: change "Dijkstra" to "Dijkstra's".
> 
> Page 16, 1st paragraph after numbered list: insert "the" before
> "Multi-path".
> 
> Page 16, section 8.6, 1st paragraph, last sentence: insert "whether"
> before "the set".
> 
> Page 16, section 9, 1st sentence: change "guideline" to "guidelines".
> 
> Page 16, section 9, 2nd sentence: delete the comma after "certain".
> 
> Page 17, "if id<fe<fp" bullet item: would it make more sense to use "a
> greater" instead of "more"?
> 
> Page 19, section 11, 2nd paragraph, 1st sentence: change "Process" to
> "Processes".
> 
> Page 19, section 11, 2nd paragraph, 2nd sentence: delete "be".
> 
> Page 19, section 11, 3rd paragraph: append "with" after "As".
> 
> Page 19, section 11, 4th paragraph, 1st sentence: insert "The" before
> "MP-OLSRv2".
> 
> Page 19, section 11, 4th paragraph, 2nd sentence: insert "the" before
> "source".
> 
> Page 20, 1st paragraph, 4th sentence: should "ancient" be "the
> oldest"?
> 
> Page 20, 1st paragraph, 5th sentence: delete comma after "that". 
> Insert "a" before "large".  Maybe change "initiates" to "sends". 
> Delete the comma after "which".
> 
> Page 24, 1st paragraph after Figure 2, 1st sentence:  insert "the"
> before "name".  Change "name" to "names".
> 
> Page 24, 1st paragraph after Figure 2, 2nd sentence: change
> "parenthesis" to "parentheses".
> 
> Page 24, 3rd paragraph after Figure 2, 3rd sentence: while I
> understand "punishment", that term hasn't been used previously and
> might be confusing.  A variant occurs elsewhere in the document. 
> Consider explaining what you mean by punishment.
> 
> Page 24, 2nd paragraph after Figure 3, 1st sentence: change "path" to
> "paths".  Append "in order" after "paths".
> 
> Page 24, 3rd paragraph after Figure 3, 2nd sentence: change
> "undesired" to "undesirable".
> 
> _______________________________________________
> manet mailing list
> manet@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]