Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host-03.txt> (Unique IPv6 Prefix Per Host) to Best Current Practice

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 26 May 2017 13:24, "Brian E Carpenter" <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
So the draft
shouldn't assume a particular prefix length either. We all know that
it's usually 64 today, but that doesn't affect the argument made by
the draft.

It's always /64 for all addresses starting with binary 000, which cannot be assigned to hosts in a real network because they are unallocated space.

We need consistency with RFC 7608 (BCP 198).

No, we don't. RFC 7608 is about forwarding, not address assignment.

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]