Dear Khaled, Speaking as sergeant-at-arms, You were recently placed under a temporary suspension of posting rights to this list [1], a message that suggested you use that time to read about the process of submitting and discussing drafts at the IETF. It seems that you have not taken advantage of the opportunity to do so, as you persist in using an overly broad recipient list when corresponding with the address used for draft submission, and are attempting to block discussion of technical issues on a list reserved for such discussions of technical issues. With my authority as sergeant-at-arms under RFC 3004, I am forced to request that the secretariat apply an additional restriction of your posting rights for the period of 60 days, starting immediately. If you do decide to bring new work to the IETF in the future, we will expect that you and keep traffic on the IETF mailing lists focused on discussion of technical issues and in the appropriate venue(s). -Ben Kaduk [1] https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg102743.html On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 10:55:02PM +0000, Khaled Omar wrote: > Hi Jasmine, > > As I'm the only author of the following IDs: > > > 1) Internet Protocol version 10 (IPv10): https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-omar-ipv10/ > > > 2) KHALED Routing Protocol (KRP): https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-omar-krp/ > > > 3) Regional Routing Protocol (RRP): https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-omar-rrp/ > > > Please remove them all from the ietf database or repository. > > If the ideas explained on these drafts will be used, discussed or published by the ietf, legal actions will be taken. > > Regards, > > Khaled Omar