This seems very reasonable to me. Glad to see it get cleared up. > On Jun 21, 2017, at 11:24 AM, The IESG <iesg-secretary@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider the > following document: - 'Well-known URIs for the WebSocket Protocol' > <draft-bormann-hybi-ws-wk-00.txt> as Proposed Standard > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final > comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2017-07-19. Exceptionally, comments may be > sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of > the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > Abstract > > > RFC 5785 defines a path prefix, "/.well-known/", that can be used by > well-known URIs, specifically for the "http" and "https" URI schemes. > The present memo formally updates RFC 6455, which defines the URI > schemes defined for the WebSocket Protocol, to extend the use of > these well-known URIs to those URI schemes. > > > > > The file can be obtained via > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bormann-hybi-ws-wk/ > > IESG discussion can be tracked via > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bormann-hybi-ws-wk/ballot/ > > > No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. > > > >