On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Job Snijders <job@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Thanks Stewart! Yes, indeed. Thank you Stewart - Directorate reviews are always appreciated. W > > On Mon, 8 May 2017 at 18:42, Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: >> >> Reviewer: Stewart Bryant >> Review result: Ready >> >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area >> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed >> by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your >> document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. >> >> For more information, please see the FAQ at >> >> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. >> >> Document: draft-ietf-grow-large-communities-usage-?? >> Reviewer: Stewart Bryant >> Review Date: 2017-05-08 >> IETF LC End Date: 2017-04-21 >> IESG Telechat date: 2017-05-11 >> >> Summary: This is now ready for publication. >> >> Major issues: None. >> >> Minor issues: None. >> >> Nits/editorial comments: None. >> >> > -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf