RE: Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend-14

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Acee, 

Thanks for correction. I updated the result as "Ready". 

BR,
Amy

-----Original Message-----
From: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:acee@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2017 8:07 PM
To: Yemin (Amy) <amy.yemin@xxxxxxxxxx>; rtg-dir@xxxxxxxx
Cc: ospf@xxxxxxxx; ietf@xxxxxxxx; draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend.all@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend-14

Hi Min ,

On 5/17/17, 5:22 AM, "Min Ye" <amy.yemin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>Reviewer: IJsbrand Wijnands
>Review result: Has Issues

I think the result is “No Issues”.

Thanks,
Acee
>
>Hi All,
>
>I have been selected to do a routing directorate QA review of this 
>draft.
>https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend-14.txt
>
>Summary: 
>
>This draft proposes a new addressing (TLV) format to more easily allow
>
>additional information to be added as part of a particular LSA.
>Overall, well written, easy to understand what the objective is for 
>this draft.
>
>Comments and Questions:
>
>This looks like a pretty radical change to the OSPFv3 spec. I would 
>almost argue to call it OSPFv4..
>
>Its very unfortunate there are no ‘reserved’ fields in RFC5340 that 
>would allow you keep the existing LSA’s format and have some way to 
>extend it differently. The TLV approach look good, I can’t see a better 
>way to achieve the goal.
>
>Minor Issues and Nits:
>none.
>
>Thx,
>
>Ice.
>
>





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]