Re: Real DMARC damage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In article <CE39F90A45FF0C49A1EA229FC9899B0537173A17@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> you write:
>Tom,
>
>Absent providing any other data points, how does this tie in with DMARC doing damage?

Google's "p=reject" makes mailing list mail from Google people disappear.  But you knew that.

On the other hand, it is true that they've been publishing p=reject
for quite a while so it's not obvious why some mail provider would
just start paying attention now.

R's,
John




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]