Re: [yang-doctors] [Teas] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo-08

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 01:43:55PM +0000, Xufeng Liu wrote:

> [Xufeng] The I2RS topology model is already NMDA style, but the NMDA
> models are not immediately implementable without NETCONF/RESTCONF
> protocol update. We will need the "-state" module for the I2RS
> topology model (and for all the top-level models) for now. While the
> NMDA is nice, the NMDA discussions have already significantly
> delayed publishing new models, and doing NMDA without staging will
> further delay the process.

Can the config and state trees reasonably be different, i.e., do you
need to be able to distinguish intended config from applied config? If
not, I think you can implement NMDA today without waiting for
NETCONF/RESTCONF protocol updates.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]