Re: wireless geolocation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: wireless geolocation
From: Randy Bush <randy@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2017 03:42:14 +0600
Cc: IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <dce335ef-c395-f0a9-9f8f-10c74ef8a4fa@gmail.com>
References: <m27f0pqgbc.wl-randy@psg.com> <424cc44e-4e2d-2950-7112-c9c0f1f12b1f@mnt.se> <dce335ef-c395-f0a9-9f8f-10c74ef8a4fa@gmail.com>
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/24.5 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)

> Geolocation via topologically defined addresses is silly. Why do we
> care about fixing it?

i was not aware that bssid/macs were topologically assigned.  i thought
they were mfr based.  i guess slaac can be used to confuddle the two. :)

randy

Follow-Ups:
- Re: wireless geolocation
  - From: Brian E Carpenter
- Re: wireless geolocation
  - From: Donald Eastlake

References:
- wireless geolocation
  - From: Randy Bush
- Re: wireless geolocation
  - From: Leif Johansson
- Re: wireless geolocation
  - From: Brian E Carpenter

Prev by Date: Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-avtext-lrr-05
Next by Date: Re: wireless geolocation
Previous by thread: Re: wireless geolocation
Next by thread: Re: wireless geolocation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]