Hi Roni, and thank you for your review. > I was wondering why this document does not update RFC6052. My > reasoning is that RFC7915 section 6 says "The translator MUST support > the stateless address mapping algorithm defined in [RFC6052], which is > the default behavior." This document suggests that the mapping in > this document can be used. There's nothing in RFC6052 that needs updating, as RFC6052 already caters for the use of its stateless address mapping algorithm with arbitrary IPv6 prefixes outside of the WKP 64:ff9b::/96. Tore