Re: wireless geolocation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Randy Bush <randy@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: wireless geolocation
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2017 12:35:30 -0400
Cc: IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <m27f0pqgbc.wl-randy@psg.com>
References: <m27f0pqgbc.wl-randy@psg.com>

Why do we even have a stable IP address range anymore?   It seems like an unnecessary lift.   If we just take what the ISP offers (IPv4 and IPv6) and use that, why is that not good enough?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: wireless geolocation
  - From: Randy Bush
- Re: wireless geolocation
  - From: Warren Kumari

References:
- wireless geolocation
  - From: Randy Bush

Prev by Date: wireless geolocation
Next by Date: Re: wireless geolocation
Previous by thread: wireless geolocation
Next by thread: Re: wireless geolocation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]