-----Original Message----- From: Khaled Omar Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 3:45 PM To: 'Paul Wouters' Subject: RE: IPv10, KRP, and RRP IDs Removal. > Your ideas will never spread if you don't know how to convey them to people. Blaming people to be unwilling to hear you, and telling others to be quiet if they are critical of your ideas only harms your ideas further. Leave this only to me, I though the ietf can make a progress with any of these IDs, but they did not, so it is useless. > I wish you luck contemplating new ideas and new ways of cooperation. Thanks, there are many ideas and can be represented anywhere. -----Original Message----- From: Paul Wouters [mailto:paul@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 3:36 PM To: Khaled Omar Subject: RE: IPv10, KRP, and RRP IDs Removal. On Tue, 23 May 2017, Khaled Omar wrote: > This is a serious official request, if it means nothing for you, stop replying. Your behaviour is wrong. It violates the rules of our community repeatedly. Which has triggered these kind of responses to you because you ignored many unofficial and a few official warnings. Your ideas will never spread if you don't know how to convey them to people. Blaming people to be unwilling to hear you, and telling others to be quiet if they are critical of your ideas only harms your ideas further. I wish you luck contemplating new ideas and new ways of cooperation. Paul > -----Original Message----- > From: shogunx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:shogunx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 2:43 PM > To: Khaled Omar > Cc: Benjamin Kaduk; ietf > Subject: Re: IPv10, KRP, and RRP IDs Removal. > > note well... i lol'd. > > On Tue, 23 May 2017, Khaled Omar wrote: > >> I don't care, once IDs will be removed, I will unsubscribe and will >> not submit anything here again. >> >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: Re: IPv10, KRP, and RRP IDs Removal. >> From: Benjamin Kaduk >> To: Khaled Omar ,ietf-secretariat@xxxxxxxx >> CC: ietf@xxxxxxxx >> >> >> Dear Khaled, >> >> Speaking as sergeant-at-arms, >> >> You were recently placed under a temporary suspension of posting >> rights to this list [1], a message that suggested you use that >> time to read about the process of submitting and discussing >> drafts >> at the IETF. It seems that you have not taken advantage of the >> opportunity to do so, as you persist in using an overly broad >> recipient list when corresponding with the address used for >> draft >> submission, and are attempting to block discussion of technical >> issues on a list reserved for such discussions of technical >> issues. >> >> With my authority as sergeant-at-arms under RFC 3004, I am >> forced to >> request that the secretariat apply an additional restriction of >> your >> posting rights for the period of 60 days, starting immediately. >> >> If you do decide to bring new work to the IETF in the future, we >> will expect that you and keep traffic on the IETF mailing >> lists focused on discussion of technical issues and in the >> appropriate venue(s). >> >> -Ben Kaduk >> >> [1] >> >> https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg102743.html >> >> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 10:55:02PM +0000, Khaled Omar wrote: >> > Hi Jasmine, >> > >> > As I'm the only author of the following IDs: >> > >> > >> > 1) Internet Protocol version 10 (IPv10): >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-omar-ipv10/ >> > >> > >> > 2) KHALED Routing Protocol (KRP): >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-omar-krp/ >> > >> > >> > 3) Regional Routing Protocol (RRP): >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-omar-rrp/ >> > >> > >> > Please remove them all from the ietf database or repository. >> > >> > If the ideas explained on these drafts will be used, discussed >> or published by the ietf, legal actions will be taken. >> > >> > Regards, >> > >> > Khaled Omar >> >> >> >