Hi Jonathan, Just another clarification for both TTID=0 and TLID=0 , I understand that there is one base layer, but does this case have any special meaning? Roni > -----Original Message----- > From: Gen-art [mailto:gen-art-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Roni Even > Sent: יום ד 07 יוני 2017 08:16 > To: Jonathan Lennox; Roni Even > Cc: avtext@xxxxxxxx; General Area Review Team; draft-ietf-avtext- > lrr.all@xxxxxxxx; ietf@xxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-avtext-lrr-05 > > Hi Jonathan, > I did not see the text you added yet as a response to my first question So to > better clarify my question . If the FCI has TTID=0 and TLID=2 . does it mean > that it is a request to update both? > This was also the reason for the question about both TTID=0 and TLID=0, > which layer need update or is it both? > Can you say that you want just to update temporal or spatial? > > Roni > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Gen-art [mailto:gen-art-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jonathan > > Lennox > > Sent: יום ד 07 יוני 2017 00:30 > > To: Roni Even > > Cc: draft-ietf-avtext-lrr.all@xxxxxxxx; General Area Review Team; > > avtext@xxxxxxxx; ietf@xxxxxxxx > > Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of > > draft-ietf-avtext-lrr-05 > > > > Hi, Roni — thanks for your review. Responses inline. > > > > > On Jun 1, 2017, at 2:53 AM, Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Reviewer: Roni Even > > > Review result: Ready with Issues > > > > > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > > > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by > > > the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like > > > any other last call comments. > > > > > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > > > > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > > > > > Document: draft-ietf-avtext-lrr-?? > > > Reviewer: Roni Even > > > Review Date: 2017-05-31 > > > IETF LC End Date: 2017-06-08 > > > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > > > > > Summary: > > > The document is ready with issues for a standard track RFC Major > > > issues: > > > > > > Minor issues: > > > > > > 1. Can you specify both TTID and TLID in the same FCI. > > > > Syntactically, they must both occur. > > > > If you mean can you request an upgrade in both at once, yes; I’ve > > added text to clarify this. > > > > > 2. What is the meaning of value 0 for TTID and TLID - TID or LID =0 > > > in frame marking draft means base layer if there is scalability. > > > This relates to the previous question. > > > > I’m not sure I understand this question. > > > > I’ve added text that if C=1, at least one of <TTID, TLID> MUST be > > greater than <CTID, CLID>, and both MUST be greater than or equal to > > their counterpart, so the LRR is actually requesting a layer upgrade. > > Is that what you were asking about? > > > > > 3. What would an FCI with both TTID and TLID equal 0 mean. > > > > It means you want a refresh of the base temporal/spatial layer, only. > > > > > Nits/editorial comments: > > > > > > 1. Section 3 "an Real-Time Transport Control Protocol" should be "a > > > Real…". > > > > Colin pointed out that it should say “an RTP Control Protocol” anyway. > > > > > 2. In section 3 " [RFC5104](Section 3.5.1)" there is a link to > > > section > > > 3.5.1 but it does not work. > > > > xml2rfc doesn’t have any way to link to sections of other documents, > > so the “(Section 3.5.1)” part is just a comment. > > > > I think the internet-draft tooling may have thought I was trying to > > link to a non-existent section 3.5.1 of this document, but that’s outside my > control. > > > > > 3. In section 3.2 "(see section Section 2.1)" section appears twice. > > > > Fixed. > > _______________________________________________ > > Gen-art mailing list > > Gen-art@xxxxxxxx > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art