Re: Comments on draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-11

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ho


On 5/5/17 9:28 PM, Adam Roach wrote:
> I have not yet heard anyone publicly say this document should not be
> published, and I find it a bit disingenuous to construe requests for
> improvement in such a way. <https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/strawman>

What is disingenuous is reviewing a document to death, requiring
consensus on people's expressed concerns, and then claiming, “oh no,
we're not stopping publication”.

Eliot

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]