Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-spring-ipv6-use-cases-10

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/2/17, 12:57 PM, "Stewart Bryant" <stewart.bryant@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Stewart:

Hi!  How are you?

Thanks for the detailed review!

> A significant part of the justification seems to evolve around the
> inability of MPLS to function in an IPv6 only network.

It seems to me that this statement summarizes many of the concerns you listed as Major in the review.  I can see why it seems like the justification is: “because MPLS doesn’t work, then we have to do IPv6.” – but I think that even if a complete solution exists (for an MPLS deployment on an IPv6-only network), some operators would still make the design choice of preferring an IPv6-only deployment.

I think that it would be good for the authors to refocus the justification away from “because X doesn’t work”.  Would that address this part of your concerns?

Thanks!

Alvaro.





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]