Hi Matt, thanks for the review - it's much appreciated. Just so you know: through discussion of Daniel Migualt's secdir review of 7700bis (we're progressing them all together this time!), I realized that it might be help to add another example of visually confusing characters to 7564bis, so I plan to mention CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER A U+0430 vs. LATIN SMALL LETTER A U+0061 (which will be more familiar to readers than the Cherokee characters already in the document). Peter On 6/13/17 9:13 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > Reviewer: Matthew Miller > Review result: Ready > > I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's > ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the > IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the > security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should > treat these comments just like any other last call comments. > > Document: draft-ietf-precis-7564bis-07 > Reviewer: Matthew A. Miller > Review Date: 2017-06-13 > IETF LC End Date: 2017-06-13 > IESG Telechat date: 2017-07-06 > > Summary: > > This document is ready to be published as a Standards Track document. > > This document defines a framework application protocols use to > prepare, compare, and enforce conformance of internationalized strings. > It obsoletes RFC 7564. > > This document is well written, and reinforces the security concerns > discussed in Section 12 with references in the most relevant sections > throughout the document. While much of it essentially proclaims > "be aware herein be dragons", the arguments for not proscribing more > are well laid out. > > Major Issues: NONE > > Minor Issues: NONE > > Nits: NONE > > > _______________________________________________ > precis mailing list > precis@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis >