On 2017-06-28 03:16, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 09:17:15AM +0100, Gmail wrote:
Sent from my iPad
On 27 Jun 2017, at 04:29, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@xxxxxxx> wrote:
And perhaps Stewart should look at the Errata for RFC 2119, if he has not already.
It has been my long standing concern that for all practical purposes no one look at errata! Indeed I doubt that many will until the RFC Editor appends the verified errata to RFCs, or takes some similar approach with them.
Part of why I always use the https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfcNNNN URLs is that
they do indicate when errata exist.
...
If the RFC Editor provided the errata in a machine readable format, we
could optionally inline them in the future RFC HTML format.
P.o.c.: <https://www.greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc7230.html#http.uri>
Best regards, Julian