IETF Discussion

• Date Index

• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard, (continued)
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard, Mark Nottingham
    • Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard, Barry Leiba
      • Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard, Mark Nottingham
        • Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard, Barry Leiba
          • Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard, Barry Leiba
            • Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin
            • Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard, Mark Nottingham
          • Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard, Mark Nottingham
        • Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard, Dick Franks
  • Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard, James M Snell
    • Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard, Paul C. Bryan
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard, David J. Biesack
    • Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard, Mark Nottingham
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard, David J. Biesack
    • Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard, Mark Nottingham
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard, David J. Biesack
    • Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard, Mark Nottingham
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard, David J. Biesack
    • Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard, Mark Nottingham
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard, David J. Biesack
    • Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard, Mark Nottingham
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tcpm-initcwnd-06.txt> (Increasing TCP's Initial Window) to Experimental RFC, Magnus Westerlund
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tcpm-initcwnd-06.txt> (Increasing TCP's Initial Window) to Experimental RFC, Matt Mathis
    • Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tcpm-initcwnd-06.txt> (Increasing TCP's Initial Window) to Experimental RFC, Magnus Westerlund
• draft-farrell-ft-01.txt -- what signal are we attempting to sense?, Ted Hardie
  • Re: draft-farrell-ft-01.txt -- what signal are we attempting to sense?, Stephen Farrell
    • Re: draft-farrell-ft-01.txt -- what signal are we attempting to sense?, Ted Hardie
      • Re: draft-farrell-ft-01.txt -- what signal are we attempting to sense?, Stephen Farrell
• A mailing list protocol, S Moonesamy
  • RE: A mailing list protocol, George, Wes
    • Re: A mailing list protocol, Martin Thomson
      • Re: A mailing list protocol, Scott Brim
        • Re: A mailing list protocol, Arturo Servin
          • Re: A mailing list protocol, S Moonesamy
    • RE: A mailing list protocol, Dave Cridland
      • Re: A mailing list protocol, Alessandro Vesely
    • Re: A mailing list protocol, John Levine
      • Re: A mailing list protocol, S Moonesamy
        • Re: A mailing list protocol, Melinda Shore
          • Re: A mailing list protocol, Nick Hilliard
          • Re: A mailing list protocol, John C Klensin
          • Re: A mailing list protocol, Hector Santos
          • Re: A mailing list protocol, Randy Bush
          • Re: A mailing list protocol, Randall Gellens
        • Re: A mailing list protocol, Randall Gellens
  • Message not available
    • RE: A mailing list protocol, Randall Gellens
• Re: Presentation vs. Discussion sessions (was: PowerPoint considered harmful), Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft, Abdussalam Baryun
  • RE: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft, Adrian Farrel
    • Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft, Abdussalam Baryun
• The flower standard, Pars Mutaf
  • Re: The flower standard, Pars Mutaf
  • Re: The flower standard, Pars Mutaf
• Re: I-D Action: draft-farrell-ft-01.txt, Andrew G. Malis
  • Re: I-D Action: draft-farrell-ft-01.txt, Andrew G. Malis
  • Re: I-D Action: draft-farrell-ft-01.txt, Yoav Nir
• Re: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.txt> (Special-Purpose Address Registries) to Best Current Practice, Ronald Bonica
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.txt> (Special-Purpose Address Registries) to Best Current Practice, Geoff Huston
    • RE: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.txt> (Special-Purpose Address Registries) to Best Current Practice, Ronald Bonica
      • Re: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.txt> (Special-Purpose Address Registries) to Best Current Practice, Geoff Huston
• Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-federated-fs-protocol-14, Peter Yee
  • Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-federated-fs-protocol-14, Chuck Lever
• Simplifying our processes: Conference Calls, Hannes Tschofenig
  • Re: Simplifying our processes: Conference Calls, Brian E Carpenter
    • RE: Simplifying our processes: Conference Calls, Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
      • Re: Simplifying our processes: Conference Calls, joel jaeggli
        • RE: Simplifying our processes: Conference Calls, Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
          • Re: Simplifying our processes: Conference Calls, Dave Crocker
            • Re: Simplifying our processes: Conference Calls, Hannes Tschofenig
              • Re: Simplifying our processes: Conference Calls, Donald Eastlake
                • RE: Simplifying our processes: Conference Calls, Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
                  • Re: Simplifying our processes: Conference Calls, Marc Blanchet
                  • Re: Simplifying our processes: Conference Calls, Dave Crocker
                    • Re: Simplifying our processes: Conference Calls, Hannes Tschofenig
              • Re: Simplifying our processes: Conference Calls, Doug Barton
      • Re: Simplifying our processes: Conference Calls, Brian E Carpenter
  • Re: Simplifying our processes: Conference Calls, SM
    • Re: Simplifying our processes: Conference Calls, Hannes Tschofenig
      • Re: Simplifying our processes: Conference Calls, Bob Hinden
      • Re: Simplifying our processes: Conference Calls, SM
• comment on draft-crocker-id-adoption, Loa Andersson
• Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Stephen Farrell
  • Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Dave Crocker
    • Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Melinda Shore
      • Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Dave Crocker
        • Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Stephen Farrell
          • Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Dave Crocker
            • Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Stephen Farrell
              • Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Melinda Shore
                • Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Hector Santos
                • Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Stephen Farrell
    • Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Yoav Nir
  • Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., SM
    • Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Stephen Farrell
  • Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Barry Leiba
    • Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Stephen Farrell
      • Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Barry Leiba
        • Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Barry Leiba
        • Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Stephen Farrell
  • Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Hector Santos
    • Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Stephen Farrell
  • Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Brian E Carpenter
    • Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Stephen Farrell
  • Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., "Martin J. Dürst"
    • Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Stephen Farrell
        • Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., John C Klensin
          • Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Stephen Farrell
      • Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Elwyn Davies
        • Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Barry Leiba
          • Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Stephen Farrell
            • Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Sam Hartman
              • Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Stephen Farrell
          • Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Elwyn Davies
            • Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Barry Leiba
        • Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., "Martin J. Dürst"
          • Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Randy Bush
            • Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Barry Leiba
              • Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Danny McPherson
      • Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Jari Arkko
  • Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Stewart Bryant
    • Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Stephen Farrell
      • Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Barry Leiba
        • Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Stephen Farrell
          • Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Barry Leiba
            • Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Dave Crocker
            • Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Jari Arkko
          • Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Elwyn Davies
        • Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Carsten Bormann
  • Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Marc Petit-Huguenin
    • Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Stephen Farrell
      • Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Marc Petit-Huguenin
        • Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Joel M. Halpern
    • Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., David Morris
      • Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Stephen Farrell
  • Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Jari Arkko
    • Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Stephen Farrell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Abdussalam Baryun
    • Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code..., Stephen Farrell
• NomCom 2012: Feedback Request - IAOC and TSV, NomCom Chair
• Re: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.txt> (Special-Purpose Address Registries) to Best Current Practice, SM
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.txt> (Special-Purpose Address Registries) to Best Current Practice, Pete Resnick
    • Re: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.txt> (Special-Purpose Address Registries) to Best Current Practice, SM
      • Re: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.txt> (Special-Purpose Address Registries) to Best Current Practice, Pete Resnick
        • Re: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.txt> (Special-Purpose Address Registries) to Best Current Practice, SM
• Re: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.txt> (Special-Purpose Address Registries) to Best Current Practice, Randy Bush
  • draft-bonica-special-purpose-04.txt, Randy Bush
    • Re: draft-bonica-special-purpose-04.txt, John C Klensin
    • RE: draft-bonica-special-purpose-04.txt, Ronald Bonica
    • RE: draft-bonica-special-purpose-04.txt, Ronald Bonica
      • Re: draft-bonica-special-purpose-04.txt, Randy Bush
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.txt> (Special-Purpose Address Registries) to Best Current Practice, Geoff Huston
    • Re: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.txt> (Special-Purpose Address Registries) to Best Current Practice, Randy Bush
      • Re: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.txt> (Special-Purpose Address Registries) to Best Current Practice, Geoff Huston
        • Re: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.txt> (Special-Purpose Address Registries) to Best Current Practice, Randy Bush
    • Re: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.txt> (Special-Purpose Address Registries) to Best Current Practice, Pete Resnick
      • Re: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.txt> (Special-Purpose Address Registries) to Best Current Practice, Geoff Huston
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.txt> (Special-Purpose Address Registries) to Best Current Practice, Donald Eastlake
    • RE: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.txt> (Special-Purpose Address Registries) to Best Current Practice, Ronald Bonica
• request to make the "tools version" of the agenda the default, Wes Hardaker
  • Re: request to make the "tools version" of the agenda the default, Bert Wijnen (IETF)
    • Re: request to make the "tools version" of the agenda the default, Sam Hartman
  • Re: request to make the "tools version" of the agenda the default, John C Klensin
    • Re: request to make the "tools version" of the agenda the default, Loa Andersson
      • Re: request to make the "tools version" of the agenda the default, John C Klensin
        • Re: request to make the "tools version" of the agenda the default, Wes Hardaker
          • Re: request to make the "tools version" of the agenda the default, Richard Barnes
            • Re: request to make the "tools version" of the agenda the default, Julian Reschke
            • Re: request to make the "tools version" of the agenda the default, Wes Hardaker
          • Message not available
            • Re: request to make the "tools version" of the agenda the default, Wes Hardaker
• When do we ask community for opinion and When we produce an RFC for the community?, Abdussalam Baryun
  • Re: When do we ask community for opinion and When we produce an RFC for the community?, Abdussalam Baryun
• When to adopt a draft as a WG doc (was RE: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists"), George, Wes
  • Re: When to adopt a draft as a WG doc (was RE: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists"), Brian Trammell
  • Re: When to adopt a draft as a WG doc (was RE: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists"), Barry Leiba
    • RE: When to adopt a draft as a WG doc (was RE: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists"), George, Wes
      • Re: When to adopt a draft as a WG doc (was RE: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists"), Barry Leiba
        • Re: When to adopt a draft as a WG doc (was RE: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists"), Melinda Shore
          • Re: When to adopt a draft as a WG doc (was RE: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists"), Randy Bush
            • Re: When to adopt a draft as a WG doc (was RE: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists"), Geoff Huston
        • RE: When to adopt a draft as a WG doc (was RE: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists"), George, Wes
          • Re: When to adopt a draft as a WG doc (was RE: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists"), Melinda Shore
            • RE: When to adopt a draft as a WG doc (was RE: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists"), George, Wes
              • Message not available
                • RE: When to adopt a draft as a WG doc (was RE: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists"), SM
      • Message not available
        • RE: When to adopt a draft as a WG doc (was RE: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists"), SM
          • RE: When to adopt a draft as a WG doc (was RE: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists"), Adrian Farrel
            • Re: When to adopt a draft as a WG doc (was RE: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists"), Spencer Dawkins
              • Re: When to adopt a draft as a WG doc (was RE: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists"), SM
            • RE: When to adopt a draft as a WG doc (was RE: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists"), SM
          • Re: When to adopt a draft as a WG doc (was RE: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists"), Fred Baker (fred)
    • Re: When to adopt a draft as a WG doc (was RE: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists"), Dave Crocker
      • Re: When to adopt a draft as a WG doc (was RE: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists"), Barry Leiba
        • Re: When to adopt a draft as a WG doc (was RE: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists"), Dave Crocker
  • RE: When to adopt a draft as a WG doc (was RE: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists"), Adrian Farrel
    • Creating an IETF Working Group Draft, Dave Crocker
      • Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft, Arturo Servin
        • Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft, Melinda Shore
          • Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft, Arturo Servin
            • Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft, SM
              • Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft, Arturo Servin
                • Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft, Randy Bush
                  • Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft, Arturo Servin
                    • Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft, Randy Bush
            • Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft, Randy Bush
              • Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft, Arturo Servin
                • Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft, Melinda Shore
                  • Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft, Arturo Servin
                    • Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft, Melinda Shore
                    • Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft, Brian E Carpenter
                      • Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft, Russ Housley
                        • RE: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft, Adrian Farrel
                          • Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft, Dave Crocker
                • Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft (off-topic), SM
            • Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft, Melinda Shore
      • Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft, Dave Crocker
  • Re: When to adopt a draft as a WG doc (was RE: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists"), Olafur Gudmundsson
  • Re: When to adopt a draft as a WG doc (was RE: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists"), Geoff Huston
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: When to adopt a draft as a WG doc (was RE: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists"), Abdussalam Baryun
    • Re: When to adopt a draft as a WG doc (was RE: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists"), Abdussalam Baryun
• ANRP 2013 - please nominate, Matthew Ford
  • Re: ANRP 2013 - please nominate, Matthew Ford
• "IETF work is done on the mailing lists", Barry Leiba
  • Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists", Marc Blanchet
    • Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists", Joe Touch
      • Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists", Donald Eastlake
  • Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists", joel jaeggli
  • Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists", ned+ietf
  • Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists", t.p.
    • Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists", Andrew Sullivan
  • Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists", Melinda Shore
    • RE: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists", Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
  • Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists", Geoff Huston
    • Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists", David Meyer
  • Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists", John C Klensin
    • Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists", David Morris
    • Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists", Hector Santos
  • Message not available
    • Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists", SM
  • Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists", John Leslie
    • Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists", Randy Bush
      • Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists", Yoav Nir
      • RE: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists", Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
      • Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists", Eliot Lear
        • Pre-IETF work ( was - Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists"), Dave Crocker
        • Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists", Geoff Huston
          • Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists", Eliot Lear
            • Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists", Edward Lewis
              • Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists", SM
                • Message not available
                  • Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists", Tim Chown
  • Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists", Brian E Carpenter
    • Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists", John C Klensin
      • Barely literate minutes (was: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists"), SM
        • Re: Barely literate minutes (was: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists"), John C Klensin
          • Re: Barely literate minutes, Scott Brim
            • Re: Barely literate minutes, John C Klensin
          • Re: Barely literate minutes, Sam Hartman
        • Re: Barely literate minutes, Peter Saint-Andre
          • Re: Barely literate minutes, Dave Crocker
            • Re: Barely literate minutes, Sam Hartman
            • Re: Barely literate minutes, Peter Saint-Andre
              • Re: Barely literate minutes, Pete Resnick
                • Re: Barely literate minutes, Randy Bush
                  • Re: Barely literate minutes, Bob Hinden
                    • Re: Barely literate minutes, Dave Crocker
                      • Re: Barely literate minutes, Keith Moore
                        • Re: Barely literate minutes, Dave Crocker
                • Re: Barely literate minutes, t.p.
                • Re: Barely literate minutes, Barry Leiba
                  • RE: Barely literate minutes, Lee Howard
                    • Re: Barely literate minutes, Randy Bush
                      • Re: Barely literate minutes, Suresh Krishnan
                    • Re: Barely literate minutes, Pete Resnick
                      • PowerPoint considered harmful (was Re: Barely literate minutes), Keith Moore
                        • Re: PowerPoint considered harmful (was Re: Barely literate minutes), Randall Gellens
                          • Re: PowerPoint considered harmful (was Re: Barely literate minutes), Randy Bush
                            • Re: PowerPoint considered harmful (was Re: Barely literate minutes), Melinda Shore
                              • Re: PowerPoint considered harmful (was Re: Barely literate minutes), Keith Moore
                              • Re: PowerPoint considered harmful (was Re: Barely literate minutes), SM
                            • Re: PowerPoint considered harmful (was Re: Barely literate minutes), Randall Gellens
                              • Re: PowerPoint considered harmful (was Re: Barely literate minutes), Brian E Carpenter
                                • Re: PowerPoint considered harmful (was Re: Barely literate minutes), Keith Moore
                                  • Re: PowerPoint considered harmful (was Re: Barely literate minutes), John C Klensin
                                    • Re: PowerPoint considered harmful (was Re: Barely literate minutes), Keith Moore
                                      • Re: PowerPoint considered harmful (was Re: Barely literate minutes), John C Klensin
                                        • Re: PowerPoint considered harmful (was Re: Barely literate minutes), Keith Moore
                                          • Re: PowerPoint considered harmful (was Re: Barely literate minutes), Joel M. Halpern
                                            • Re: PowerPoint considered harmful (was Re: Barely literate minutes), John C Klensin
                                              • Re: PowerPoint considered harmful (was Re: Barely literate minutes), Keith Moore
                                                • Re: PowerPoint considered harmful (was Re: Barely literate minutes), Melinda Shore
                                                  • Presentation vs. Discussion sessions (was: PowerPoint considered harmful), Keith Moore
                                                    • Re: Presentation vs. Discussion sessions, Melinda Shore
                                                      • Re: Presentation vs. Discussion sessions, Keith Moore
                                                      • Re: Presentation vs. Discussion sessions, Melinda Shore
                                                      • Re: Presentation vs. Discussion sessions, Keith Moore
                                                    • Re: Presentation vs. Discussion sessions (was: PowerPoint considered harmful), Randall Gellens
                                                  • Acculturation [was Re: PowerPoint considered harmful], Brian E Carpenter
                                        • Re: PowerPoint considered harmful (was Re: Barely literate minutes), John Levine
                                    • Re: PowerPoint considered harmful (was Re: Barely literate minutes), Randall Gellens
                                  • English spoken here (was: PowerPoint considered harmful), SM
                                    • Re: English spoken here (was: PowerPoint considered harmful), John C Klensin
                                      • Useful slide tex (was - Re: English spoken here), Dave Crocker
                                        • Re: Useful slide tex (was - Re: English spoken here), Keith Moore
                                          • Re: Useful slide tex (was - Re: English spoken here), Dave Crocker
                                            • Re: Useful slide tex (was - Re: English spoken here), Keith Moore
                                              • Re: Useful slide tex (was - Re: English spoken here), joel jaeggli
                                                • Re: Useful slide tex (was - Re: English spoken here), Keith Moore
                                                  • Re: Useful slide tex (was - Re: English spoken here), joel jaeggli
                                                    • Re: Useful slide tex (was - Re: English spoken here), Keith Moore
                                                      • Re: Useful slide tex (was - Re: English spoken here), Joel jaeggli
                                                      • Re: Useful slide tex (was - Re: English spoken here), Randy Bush
                                                      • Re: Useful slide tex (was - Re: English spoken here), Joel jaeggli
                                                      • Re: Useful slide tex (was - Re: English spoken here), Randy Bush
                                                      • Re: Useful slide tex (was - Re: English spoken here), joel jaeggli
                                                      • Re: Useful slide tex (was - Re: English spoken here), Dave Crocker
                                                      • Re: Useful slide tex (was - Re: English spoken here), Melinda Shore
                                                      • RE: Useful slide tex (was - Re: English spoken here), George, Wes
                                                      • Re: Useful slide tex (was - Re: English spoken here), Keith Moore
                                                • Re: Useful slide tex (was - Re: English spoken here), Fred Baker (fred)
                                                  • Message not available
                                                    • Re: Useful slide tex (was - Re: English spoken here), Tim Chown
                                                      • Re: Useful slide tex (was - Re: English spoken here), Keith Moore
                                              • RE: Useful slide tex (was - Re: English spoken here), George, Wes
                                                • Re: Useful slide tex (was - Re: English spoken here), Keith Moore
                                                  • RE: Useful slide tex (was - Re: English spoken here), George, Wes
                                                  • Re: Useful slide tex (was - Re: English spoken here), Tony Hansen
                                                  • RE: Useful slide tex (was - Re: English spoken here), Lee Howard
                                      • Re: English spoken here (was: PowerPoint considered harmful), SM
                                      • Re: English spoken here (was: PowerPoint considered harmful), Steven Bellovin
                                        • Re: English spoken here, Keith Moore
                                          • Re: English spoken here, Steven Bellovin
                                            • Re: English spoken here, John C Klensin
                    • Re: Barely literate minutes, Fernando Gont
              • Re: Barely literate minutes, Dave Crocker
            • Re: Barely literate minutes, SM
            • RE: Barely literate minutes, Hutton, Andrew
    • Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists", tglassey
  • Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists", Keith Moore
    • Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists", Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists", Dave Crocker
    • Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists", Murray S. Kucherawy
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists", Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Brian Haberman
  • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Luigi Iannone
• A Splendid Example Of A Renumbering Disaster, Sabahattin Gucukoglu
  • Re: A Splendid Example Of A Renumbering Disaster, David Conrad
    • Re: A Splendid Example Of A Renumbering Disaster, Christopher Morrow
    • Re: A Splendid Example Of A Renumbering Disaster, Brian E Carpenter
  • Re: A Splendid Example Of A Renumbering Disaster, Paul Wouters
    • Re: A Splendid Example Of A Renumbering Disaster, Andrew G. Malis
      • Re: A Splendid Example Of A Renumbering Disaster, Benson Schliesser
        • Re: A Splendid Example Of A Renumbering Disaster, Paul Wouters
  • Re: A Splendid Example Of A Renumbering Disaster, Pete Resnick
    • Re: A Splendid Example Of A Renumbering Disaster, Cameron Byrne
      • Re: A Splendid Example Of A Renumbering Disaster, Pete Resnick
    • Re: A Splendid Example Of A Renumbering Disaster, Sabahattin Gucukoglu
• IETF Chair's Presentation at the Global Standards Symposium in Dubai, IETF Chair
• Round 2: Proposed IETF Meeting Dates 2018 - 2022, IETF Administrative Director
• NomCom: Call for Nominations - IAOC Mid-Term Vacancy, NomCom Chair
  • Re: NomCom: Call for Nominations - IAOC Mid-Term Vacancy, Phillip Hallam-Baker
    • Re: NomCom: Call for Nominations - IAOC Mid-Term Vacancy, Matthew Lepinski
    • Re: NomCom: Call for Nominations - IAOC Mid-Term Vacancy, Yoav Nir
      • RE: NomCom: Call for Nominations - IAOC Mid-Term Vacancy, Eric Gray
        • Message not available
          • RE: NomCom: Call for Nominations - IAOC Mid-Term Vacancy, SM
        • Re: NomCom: Call for Nominations - IAOC Mid-Term Vacancy, Suresh Krishnan
          • Re: NomCom: Call for Nominations - IAOC Mid-Term Vacancy, Ralph Droms
            • RE: NomCom: Call for Nominations - IAOC Mid-Term Vacancy, Eric Gray
          • RE: NomCom: Call for Nominations - IAOC Mid-Term Vacancy, Eric Gray
    • Re: NomCom: Call for Nominations - IAOC Mid-Term Vacancy, Matthew Lepinski
• RE: [Softwires] Last Call: <draft-ietf-softwire-6rd-radius-attrib-07.txt> (RADIUS Attribute for 6rd) to Proposed Standard, Leaf Yeh
  • RE: [Softwires] Last Call: <draft-ietf-softwire-6rd-radius-attrib-07.txt> (RADIUS Attribute for 6rd) to Proposed Standard, Maglione Roberta
    • RE: [Softwires] Last Call: <draft-ietf-softwire-6rd-radius-attrib-07.txt> (RADIUS Attribute for 6rd) to Proposed Standard, Leaf Yeh
      • RE: [Softwires] Last Call: <draft-ietf-softwire-6rd-radius-attrib-07.txt> (RADIUS Attribute for 6rd) to Proposed Standard, Maglione Roberta
        • RE: [Softwires] Last Call: <draft-ietf-softwire-6rd-radius-attrib-07.txt> (RADIUS Attribute for 6rd) to Proposed Standard, Sheng Jiang
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Bert Wijnen (IETF)
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Luigi Iannone
    • Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Bert Wijnen (IETF)
• Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-karp-routing-tcp-analysis-05.txt, Ben Campbell
  • Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-karp-routing-tcp-analysis-05.txt, Mahesh Jethanandani
    • Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-karp-routing-tcp-analysis-05.txt, Ben Campbell
      • Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-karp-routing-tcp-analysis-05.txt, Mahesh Jethanandani
        • Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-karp-routing-tcp-analysis-05.txt, Mahesh Jethanandani
          • Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-karp-routing-tcp-analysis-05.txt, Ben Campbell
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, SM
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Luigi Iannone
    • Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, SM
    • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Geoff Huston
• Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Roger Jørgensen
  • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, George Michaelson
    • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Luigi Iannone
  • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Luigi Iannone
  • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Sander Steffann
    • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Luigi Iannone
      • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Sander Steffann
      • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Arturo Servin
        • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Dino Farinacci
          • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Arturo Servin
            • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Dino Farinacci
              • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Sander Steffann
          • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Sander Steffann
            • RE: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Paul Vinciguerra
              • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Sander Steffann
              • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Dino Farinacci
                • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Sander Steffann
            • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Dino Farinacci
              • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Sander Steffann
                • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Dino Farinacci
                  • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Sander Steffann
                    • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Dino Farinacci
                      • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, George Michaelson
                        • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Joel M. Halpern
                          • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Arturo Servin
                      • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Sander Steffann
                        • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Brian E Carpenter
                          • RE: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, George, Wes
                      • Message not available
                        • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Dino Farinacci
                          • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, George Michaelson
                            • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, George Michaelson
                            • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Sander Steffann
                              • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Arturo Servin
                                • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Dino Farinacci
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Paul Vinciguerra
    • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Sander Steffann
  • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Roger Jørgensen
    • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Joel M. Halpern
      • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Brian E Carpenter
        • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Joel M. Halpern
          • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Sander Steffann
            • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Joel Halpern Direct
              • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Geoff Huston
                • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, heinerhummel
                • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Geoff Huston
                  • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, SM
                  • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Sander Steffann
                  • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Dino Farinacci
                • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Robert Elz
                  • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Geoff Huston
                  • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Robert Elz
          • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Cameron Byrne
          • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Dino Farinacci
        • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, SM
    • RE: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Paul Vinciguerra
  • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Noel Chiappa
  • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Noel Chiappa
    • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Cameron Byrne
  • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Noel Chiappa
  • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Noel Chiappa
    • RE: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, George, Wes
  • RE: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Noel Chiappa
    • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Sander Steffann
    • RE: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, George, Wes
      • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Dino Farinacci
        • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Roger Jørgensen
          • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Brian E Carpenter
            • Re: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Dino Farinacci
  • RE: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC, Noel Chiappa
• RFP for IETF Meeting Network Services, IETF Administrative Director
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RFP for IETF Meeting Network Services, IETF Administrative Director
• NASA just bought IRTF, Stephane Bortzmeyer
  • Re: NASA just bought IRTF, Stephen Farrell
    • Re: NASA just bought IRTF, tglassey
  • Re: NASA just bought IRTF, tglassey
• Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-mptcp-api-06, Ben Campbell
• in-person vs remote participation (was: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF]), George, Wes
  • Re: in-person vs remote participation (was: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF]), Dave Crocker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • in-person vs remote participation (was: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF]), George, Wes
    • Re: in-person vs remote participation (was: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF]), Riccardo Bernardini
      • Re: in-person vs remote participation, Melinda Shore
    • Re: in-person vs remote participation (was: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF]), Michael Richardson
• New on RIPE Labs: Global Effect of Hurricane Sandy as Seen in RIPE Atlas, Bert Wijnen (IETF)
• Meetecho recording of the Plenary session, Meetecho IETF support
• IETF 85 Bits-n-Bytes, Brzozowski, John
• Common sense, process, and the nature of change, Ted Hardie
  • Re: Common sense, process, and the nature of change, Andrew Sullivan
    • Re: Common sense, process, and the nature of change, Ted Hardie
  • Re: Common sense, process, and the nature of change, Sam Hartman
    • Re: Common sense, process, and the nature of change, Ted Hardie
      • Re: Common sense, process, and the nature of change, Sam Hartman
        • Re: Common sense, process, and the nature of change, Randy Bush
          • Re: Common sense, process, and the nature of change, Eliot Lear
  • Re: Common sense, process, and the nature of change, Dave Crocker
    • Re: Common sense, process, and the nature of change, Ted Hardie
  • Message not available
    • Re: Common sense, process, and the nature of change, SM
      • Re: Common sense, process, and the nature of change, Eliot Lear
      • Re: Common sense, process, and the nature of change, t.p.
  • Re: Common sense, process, and the nature of change, Scott Brim
    • Re: Common sense, process, and the nature of change, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: Common sense, process, and the nature of change, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: Common sense, process, and the nature of change, Melinda Shore
• Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Adrian Farrel
  • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Riccardo Bernardini
  • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Andrew G. Malis
    • Message not available
      • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], SM
        • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Andrew G. Malis
          • Message not available
            • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], SM
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Abdussalam Baryun
    • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Yoav Nir
      • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Vinayak Hegde
        • Message not available
          • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], SM
            • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Mikael Abrahamsson
              • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Hector Santos
              • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Hector Santos
              • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], SM
              • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Brian E Carpenter
                • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Mikael Abrahamsson
                  • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Riccardo Bernardini
                    • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Yoav Nir
                  • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Dale R. Worley
                    • RE: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Adrian Farrel
                • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Carlos M. Martinez
                  • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Stephen Farrell
                    • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Nick Hilliard
                    • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Carlos M. Martinez
                      • Re: Newcomers, Sam Hartman
                        • Accessible remote participation usability (was -- Re: Newcomers), Dave Crocker
                  • REMOTE PARTICIPATION TEMPLATES: was Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], tglassey
        • Re: how do Newcomers work in the IETF [Was: Evolutionizing, John Levine
      • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Abdussalam Baryun
        • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Abdussalam Baryun
        • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], John Levine
        • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], joel jaeggli
          • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Yoav Nir
    • Message not available
      • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], SM
        • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Fred Baker (fred)
          • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Arturo Servin
            • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], SM
              • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Arturo Servin
                • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], David Morris
            • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Brian E Carpenter
              • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Arturo Servin
                • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], joel jaeggli
                  • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Brian E Carpenter
                • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Randy Bush
                  • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Arturo Servin
                    • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Randy Bush
                      • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Bob Hinden
                        • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Arturo Servin
                          • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Bob Hinden
                    • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Melinda Shore
                      • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Mary Barnes
                        • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Donald Eastlake
                        • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Spencer Dawkins
                      • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Arturo Servin
                        • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Melinda Shore
                • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], SM
                • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Andrew Sullivan
                  • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Vinayak Hegde
                    • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Andrew Sullivan
                • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Rich Kulawiec
                  • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Arturo Servin
                • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Dale R. Worley
                  • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Dave Crocker
                    • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Carsten Bormann
                      • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Dave Crocker
                        • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Arturo Servin
                          • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Melinda Shore
                            • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Arturo Servin
                              • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Melinda Shore
                                • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Arturo Servin
                                  • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Melinda Shore
                                    • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Arturo Servin
                                    • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Brian E Carpenter
                                      • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], t.p.
                                        • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Tony Hansen
                                          • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Marc Petit-Huguenin
                                        • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Dale R. Worley
                                      • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Carlos M. Martinez
                                        • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Melinda Shore
                                          • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Carlos M. Martinez
                                  • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], joel jaeggli
                                  • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], John Levine
                                    • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Patrik Fältström
                                      • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], John R Levine
                                        • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Carlos M. Martinez
                                          • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Dave Crocker
                                            • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Arturo Servin
                                            • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Carlos M. Martinez
                                          • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], John R Levine
                                            • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Arturo Servin
                                              • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], John Levine
                                                • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Arturo Servin
                                                  • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], John R. Levine
                                                • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Carlos M. Martinez
                                                  • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Yoav Nir
                                                  • Message not available
                                                    • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Tim Chown
                                                • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Fernando Gont
                                                  • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], John R Levine
                        • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Carsten Bormann
                          • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Dave Crocker
                            • Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF], Carsten Bormann
• Evolutionizing the IETF, SM
  • Re: Evolutionizing the IETF, joel jaeggli
  • Re: Evolutionizing the IETF, Brian E Carpenter
    • Re: Evolutionizing the IETF, SM
• IETF Plenary streaming. - Is originating out of ballroom C, joel jaeggli
• To the sergeant-at-arms of this list, Brian E Carpenter
  • Re: To the sergeant-at-arms of this list, Yoav Nir
• Re: [Fecframe] Last Call: <draft-ietf-fecframe-simple-rs-04.txt> (Simple Reed-Solomon Forward Error Correction (FEC) Scheme for FECFRAME) to Proposed Standard, Vincent Roca
  • Re: [Fecframe] Last Call: <draft-ietf-fecframe-simple-rs-04.txt> (Simple Reed-Solomon Forward Error Correction (FEC) Scheme for FECFRAME) to Proposed Standard, Luby, Michael
• IESG Considering a Revision to NOTE WELL, IETF Chair
  • Re: IESG Considering a Revision to NOTE WELL, Ted Hardie
    • Re: IESG Considering a Revision to NOTE WELL, Dave Crocker
      • Re: IESG Considering a Revision to NOTE WELL, David Morris
  • Re: IESG Considering a Revision to NOTE WELL, Brian E Carpenter
    • Re: IESG Considering a Revision to NOTE WELL, Russ Housley
      • Re: IESG Considering a Revision to NOTE WELL, Brian E Carpenter
        • Re: IESG Considering a Revision to NOTE WELL, Dave Crocker
          • Re: IESG Considering a Revision to NOTE WELL, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: IESG Considering a Revision to NOTE WELL, t.p.