Le 2012-12-05 à 04:25, Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo) a écrit : > Hi Donald, > >> It's a question of costs and benefits. The cost of the IETF Announce >> posting is small. There are not that many of them and I don't find >> them to be a burden. > > How many conference calls as part of working group activities did you > organize in the last two years? I did some. > > Maybe there are not that many because the overhead is too high to > organize them. don't agree. Matter of minutes. > >> The benefit in openness and transparency is >> large. I agree with Donald. Marc. > > Are working group activities not open and transparent in your view? > >> Thus the answer is simple and the policy should remain as it is >> for now. If conditions change, it can certainly be revisited. > How many conference calls of working groups you are not subscribed to > did you attend? > > Ciao > Hannes > > >> Thanks, >> Donald >> ============================= >> Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) >> 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA >> d3e3e3@xxxxxxxxx >> >> >> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Hannes Tschofenig >> <Hannes.Tschofenig@xxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> The concept is simple: a time-specific gather is a meeting. >> Meetings >>>> require prior announcement beyond the working group. >>> >>> I am not against a meeting announcement. I am suggesting to announce >> the >>> meeting where the audience is -- in the working group. >>>