Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I totally agree with you,

AB

+++
As an operator, I purchase equipment and need to write RFQs. I would
like to able to ask more than "does the product implement RFC
<whatever>", I want to also ask "Please document all instances where
you did not follow all MUST and SHOULD, and why".

Otherwise I think there needs to be better definition of what it means
to "implement" or "support" an RFC when it comes to completness and
what this means as per following SHOULD and MAY.
--
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike at swm.pp.se


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]