Hi Mikael >Also what it means following things in it that is not RFC2119 language. It will mean, you should understand me/english/ietf/procedure even if I don't have to explain, and you need to understand English well even if you are a great implementor or great programming language speaker. AB === On 1/5/13, Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I totally agree with you, > > AB > > +++ > As an operator, I purchase equipment and need to write RFQs. I would > like to able to ask more than "does the product implement RFC > <whatever>", I want to also ask "Please document all instances where > you did not follow all MUST and SHOULD, and why". > > Otherwise I think there needs to be better definition of what it means > to "implement" or "support" an RFC when it comes to completness and > what this means as per following SHOULD and MAY. > -- > Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike at swm.pp.se >