Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: John Day <jeanjour@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
From: John Scudder <jgs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 15:50:16 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
Cc: ietf <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <a062408a2cd10003cf574@[10.0.1.3]>
Thread-index: AQHN7JJ9+4KZ60tG4kWRpNOAqIvUBJg+BDum
Thread-topic: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]

On Jan 6, 2013, at 11:50 PM, "John Day" <jeanjour@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> However, in the IETF there is also a requirement that there be two independent but communicating implementations for an RFC to standards-track. Correct?

Alas, no. 

--John

Follow-Ups:
- Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  - From: John Day

References:
- Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  - From: Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  - From: John Day

Prev by Date: Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again
Next by Date: Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
Previous by thread: Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
Next by thread: Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]