Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Jan 5, 2013, at 10:03 AM, John C Klensin <john-ietf@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> And, again, that is further complicated by the observation that
> IETF Standards are used for procurement and even for litigation
> about product quality.   We either need to accept that fact and,
> where necessary, adjust our specification style to match or we
> run the risk of bodies springing up who will profile our
> Standards, write procurement-quality conformance statements for
> their profiles, and become, de facto, the real standards-setter
> for the marketplace (and obviously do so without any element of
> IETF consensus).  

I'm not sure that's not a good thing. Witness for example the work SIP Forum has done with the SIPConnect standards, which have made it MUCH easier to order a box that will work with a SIP Trunking service.

--
Dean





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]