Re: The notion of "fast tracking" drafts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




--On Sunday, December 16, 2012 15:08 -0500 Keith Moore
<moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> to this I'd add
> 
> (5) Widespread, examined belief that the specification has
> minimal impact on the Internet architecture.
> 
> I keep seeing IETF standardize protocols that seem likely to
> have seriously damaging architectural impact without much, if
> any, examination of that impact (the PCP and MIF work come
> most immediately to mind, but I could cite several others
> given a few minutes to think about it).  I'd hate to see a
> fast-tracking procedure used as a way to further circumvent
> such examination.

I think I would have said "impact on the Internet architecture
is well-understood and judged to be acceptable" instead, but we
agree about the general principle.

   john





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]