Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>Yes, you've brought that to our attention several times. If you wanted this spec to align with your software, it would have been much easier if you'd got involved before Last Call.

Why is it called <Last Call> if we don't accept any new input (e.g.,
draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07) . Why do we call RFC <Request For
Comment> if we don't want people to comment on (e.g. RFC2119).

We SHOULD discuss any input any time, thank the participant, and
accept only consensus on each input at any phase of time.

AB


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]