> to clarify, my proposal only applies to Internet Drafts, and clearly > states that the implementation section should be removed from the > document before it is published as RFC. > > Formally, we don't want non-permanent stuff in RFCs. And realistically, > even if we had an implementation wiki, it is unlikely to be kept up to > date once the RFC is published. so, we act on implementation and interoperability data which are not kept? randy