On 12/3/2012 6:36 AM, Barry Leiba wrote:
Or we'll just waste time sticking in some side-process that isn't
necessary (all of this can already been done under current process,
with no experiment).
...
That's a better promise than saying we'll cut out three or four weeks
of review time for a document that probably took 16 months to develop.
+10
d/
ps. given how creative human can be, in generating unintended
consequences, an incentive to create running code /before/ going to
Proposed could serve to /increase/ the barrier to standardization, by
creating a perception that having running code is pragmatically required
to get past the IESG.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net