On Mon, 3 Dec 2012, Marc Petit-Huguenin wrote: > I support this idea, but I think that free software should also be considered > as part of this experiment (free software and open source are not synonymous). > Using the acronym FOSS and defining it as Free or Open Source Software in the > document would achieve this. By my understanding free is not applicable in that software can be free without the source being available. The key in my mind to the open source sugestion is the ability of others to examine the actual code for coverage of edge concerns or whatever. Open source is available today under many license agreements. Free is not a requirement to achieve the review objective.