Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Actually I think you make a couple of great points that ought be
> mentioned in the draft about implementability. (No chance you'd
> have time to craft a paragraph? If not, I'll try pinch text from
> above:-) Now that you point it out like that, I'm irritated at
> myself for not having included it already! (It rings bells for me.)

OK, I think the place for a new paragraph is just before the last
paragraph of section 2. How about something along the lines of:

   A complete and correct specification is not in and of itself a guarantee of
   high quality implementations. What may seem like minor details can
   increase implementation difficulty substantially, leading to implementations
   that are fragile, contain unnecessary restrictions, or do not scale well.
   Implementation experience has the potential to catch these problems before
   the specification is finalized and becomes difficult to change.

You might also want to change the final paragraph of the section a bit in
light of the addition; I'll leave that to you to work out.

Hope this helps.

				Ned



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]